Is it possible that never living could be a loss?
__________________________________________________ _______
From: (Kevin and Donna Brandon) Newsgroups: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,alt.f ood.vegan.science Subject: Another ****wit Date: 1 Jun 2003 07:27:23 -0700 If life is a benefit, then no-life is a loss. ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ |
Is it possible that never living could be a loss?
NO.
|
Is it possible that never living could be a loss?
wrote:
__________________________________________________ _______ From: (Kevin and Donna Brandon) Newsgroups: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,alt.f ood.vegan.science Subject: Another ****wit Date: 1 Jun 2003 07:27:23 -0700 If life is a benefit, then no-life is a loss. ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ That's not Kevin's thought, ****wit, you lump of shit. It's the absurd imlication of your ****witted belief. |
Is it possible that never living could be a loss?
This article has no bearing for sci.archaeology at all.
It's as OT as OT can be. Stop sending us this nonsense. Inger E "Jonathan Ball" skrev i meddelandet ... wrote: __________________________________________________ _______ From: (Kevin and Donna Brandon) Newsgroups: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,alt.f ood.vegan.science Subject: Another ****wit Date: 1 Jun 2003 07:27:23 -0700 If life is a benefit, then no-life is a loss. ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ That's not Kevin's thought, ****wit, you lump of shit. It's the absurd imlication of your ****witted belief. |
Is it possible that never living could be a loss?
wrote in message ... __________________________________________________ _______ From: (Kevin and Donna Brandon) Newsgroups: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,alt.f ood.vegan.science Subject: Another ****wit Date: 1 Jun 2003 07:27:23 -0700 If life is a benefit, then no-life is a loss. ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ Can you define benefit in this context? |
Is it possible that never living could be a loss?
"Inger E Johansson" wrote in message ... This article has no bearing for sci.archaeology at all. It's as OT as OT can be. Stop sending us this nonsense. Inger E While digging up tablets or other ways to record data have researchers ever found indications of derogatory language or swearing? If so then there is at least one instance where this topic is relevant to sci.archaeology. "Jonathan Ball" skrev i meddelandet ... wrote: __________________________________________________ _______ From: (Kevin and Donna Brandon) Newsgroups: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,alt.f ood.vegan.science Subject: Another ****wit Date: 1 Jun 2003 07:27:23 -0700 If life is a benefit, then no-life is a loss. ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ That's not Kevin's thought, ****wit, you lump of shit. It's the absurd imlication of your ****witted belief. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:12 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter