LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old 10-07-2003, 12:31 AM
 
Posts: n/a
Default Monsanto's GMOs assault on farmers




-------- Original Message --------
Subject: SCHMEISER'S BATTLE FOR THE SEED
Date: 9 Jul 2003 07:58:53 -0500
From: MichaelP

THE INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE IN SOCIETY,
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/

http://www.i-sis.org.uk/SLBFTS.php

What makes a farmer from a small rural community in Saskatchewan stand up
to Monsanto? And possibly, win? Dr. Mae-Wan Ho reports.

Percy Schmeiser, now in his early seventies, a soft-spoken, mild-mannered
Canadian farmer from the small rural community of Bruno some 80km east of
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, never dreamt he would be catapulted to the status
of a contemporary folk- hero. He had been farming for 40 years when he was
taken to court by biotech giant Monsanto in August 1998. The company
claimed he had illegally planted its genetically engineered Roundup Ready
canola without paying a $37-per-hectare fee for the privilege.

Schmeiser was not alone. Monsanto had accused scores of farmers of patent
infringing on its genetically engineered seed. But, instead of settling
out of court with Monsanto like the others, Schmeiser fought back. He had
been sowing each crop with seeds saved and selected from the previous
harvest for years, and had never purchased seed from Monsanto. Even so, he
found more than 320 hectares of his land contaminated by Monsanto's
Roundup Ready canola.

Schmeiser insisted that any Roundup Ready growing on his land was spread
by wind or by grain trucks travelling on roads adjacent to his fields.

On 10 August 1999, mediation talks to settle the dispute ended in failure.
The next day, Schmeiser launched a $10 million lawsuit against Monsanto,
accusing the company of a variety of wrongs, including libel, trespass and
contaminating his fields with Roundup Ready canola. But Schmeiser's
lawsuit against Monsanto won't be dealt with until the original lawsuit
has been resolved. Little did he know what a long, hard battle he has
taken on.

It is a battle for the seed, for every farmer's right to save and resow
harvested seed, to freely share and exchange without restriction, as
farmers have been doing for at least 15 000 years since agriculture began.

The trial was heard in June 2000, in the Federal Court in Saskatoon. At
the trial, Monsanto presented evidence from two dozen witnesses and
samplers that Schmeiser's eight fields were all more than 90% Roundup
Ready. Monsanto had performed no independent tests, however; the tests
were all performed in house or by experts hired by the company.

In defence, Schmeiser presented his own farm-based evidence, that the
fields ranged from nearly zero to 68% Roundup Ready, which was confirmed
independently by research scientists at the University of Manitoba,
Winnipeg. Schmeiser's defence also contained evidence that he did not
knowingly acquire Monsanto's product, nor did he segregate the
contaminated seeds for future use or spray his canola crops with Roundup

But the Federal Court ruled against Schmeiser. Justice Andrew McKay upheld
the validity of Monsanto's patented gene. In a key part of the ruling, the
judge agreed a farmer can generally own the seeds or plants grown on his
land if they blow in or are carried there by pollen; but this is not true
in the case of genetically modified seed.

It didn't matter how the Roundup Ready canola got to his fields. He was
deemed to have infringed Monsanto patent, and was fined $15/acre x 1030
acres licence fee, plus the value of his entire crop, $105,000 (including
fields that did not have any Roundup Ready canola), plus $25,000 for
punitive and exemplary damages.

"Where does Monsanto's rights end and mine begin?" Percy Schmeiser asked.
He refused to abide by the judgement, and launched an appeal, which was
heard in May 2002 in Saskatoon.

Unfortunately, all three judges ruled against him yet again. By this time,
he and Louise, his wife of 50 years, had already spent $ 200 000 in legal
fees. He had ceased to plant canola, for any canola crop he planted would
belong to Monsanto.

Monsanto had kept up a constant campaign of harassment and intimidation
all through the trial in 1999 and 2000. And in 2001, Monsanto brought a
new case against Schmeiser for $1 million in court costs -- $750 000 for
their lawyers, $250 000 for disbursements which included travel expenses,
payments for expert witnesses and $15 000 lawyer's night entertainments'.

Undaunted, Percy Schmeiser took his case to the Supreme court, and in May
2003, when I caught up with him at the Biodevastation 7 meeting held in
Monsanto's hometown St. Louis, Missouri, he just got the good news that he
has won his right to be heard in the Supreme Court. There were loud cheers
in the hall.

Percy Schmeiser has been tireless in travelling the world to tell his
story. Everywhere, farmers are fighting for their lives and livelihoods.
Monsanto winning would be the very last straw, not just for farmers, for
everyone. Schmeiser has come to symbolise our collective struggle against
corporate serfdom. Just as independent scientists are oppressed and
victimised, farmers are subject to the same or worse treatment.

Monsanto's tactics are well known. The company gets farmers to sign away
all their rights in an unbelievable technology contract. The farmer must
not use his or her own seed, must buy seed and chemicals from Monsanto.
Monsanto can send inspectors onto your fields for three years even if you
grow the company's crops for only one year.

Monsanto also openly advertises for people to tell on their neighbours if
they are suspected of having GM crops without licence. The company's
representatives can trespass onto your fields even when you are not at
home, or fly over your field and spray Roundup to see if the crop dies.

Immediately after Monsanto had obtained its judgement against Percy
Schmeiser, the company had declared war on all Saskatchewan farmers.
Schmeiser received hundreds of phone calls from farmers who have been
contacted by Monsanto representatives and received demand letters saying
that they have unauthorised GM crops growing in their fields and must pay
so many thousands of dollars to avoid lawsuit. Many of the farmers who
called Schmeiser were in the same circumstances: they never bought any
seed from Monsanto or signed any contract.

But things may be turning Schmeiser's (and our) way at long last.

In June 2002, a report from the Canadian Biotechnology Advisory Committee
said that the Patent Act should be amended to permit farmers to save and
sow seeds from patented plants such as genetically engineered (GE) crops.

It also said that farmers who find GE plants growing in their fields
through "the adventitious spreading of patented seed or patented genetic
material or the insemination of an animal by a patented animal" should be
considered as innocent bystanders and not be liable to prosecution.

While biotechnology developments are patentable, the report said the
holder does not have "the right to market or even use the invention. This
is because some applications of the technology may pose risks to human or
animal health or to the environment, challenge the capacity of current
approaches to protecting health and the environment and or raise other
serious social and ethical questions that must be addressed."

The report suggests that the farmer be allowed to use the seed of a GE
crop or the offspring of a GE animal for his or her own use but not for
commercial purposes.

Better yet, in December 2002, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the
genetically engineered Harvard oncomouse is not patentable (see "Canada
rejects patents on higher forms of life ", ISIS Report, March 2003 ). This
opens the door to revoking patents on GM seeds, such as Monsanto's Roundup
Ready canola. This could be the last nudge to get GM crops off our globe.

Help Percy fight Monsanto and get patents on life revoked for a GM-Free
world. Make a donation on his website: www.percyschmeiser.com

======================

*** NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposes. Feel free to distribute widely but PLEASE acknowledge the
original source. ***
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New threats by Monsanto to family farmers Billy[_10_] Edible Gardening 3 28-06-2011 04:03 PM
New threats by Monsanto to family farmers Billy[_10_] Gardening 2 04-06-2011 03:58 AM
Any tropcal or temperate farmers or hobby farmers here? Loosecanon Australia 6 03-10-2010 11:04 AM
Monsanto's GMOs assault on farmers [email protected] sci.agriculture 1 10-07-2003 11:46 PM
thanks, here are specific harms, already caused, by GMOs. Info and Links... CaringIsTheFirstStep Edible Gardening 0 04-05-2003 03:44 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 GardenBanter.co.uk.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Gardening"

 

Copyright © 2017