Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
Bt pesticide resistance
On 3 Sep 2003 09:41:16 GMT, Brian Sandle
posted: In sci.agriculture Mooshie peas wrote: On 28 Aug 2003 23:29:25 GMT, Brian Sandle posted: In sci.agriculture Mooshie peas wrote: On 28 Aug 2003 14:23:53 GMT, Brian Sandle posted: Do you have the database of withdrawn applications and why they were withdrawn? A while back I referred to a submission by Jack Heineman against approval of another organisation's application for GM work in NZ. The other organisation withdrew the application. Was Dr Ingham's work, connected with the EPA, the cause of a dangerous or dubious application being withdrawn? No idea. You'll have to eyeball your regulator's documentation, I would think. That's right, where do they keep the records of withdrawn applications and what has caused the withdrawal? I suspect a bash at Google would find some information about this if it was at all interesting. If you don't find anything, it's likely that there was nothing newsworthy about it. Everything vaguely newsworth is published on the Web, IME I have checked again and http://www.aphis.usda.gov/bbep/ is still not even giving out data for ordinary applications any more. Somehow I think the data about withdrawn applications in USA will be kept covered. Then we won't be able to verify the claim about the withdrawal of the GM Klebsiella application following Ingham's research findings. I suspect that if there was anything to it, you would find much conspiracy theory conjecture on the net. Nothing there? Nothing to it, IMHO. |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
Bt pesticide resistance
Mooshie peas wrote:
On 3 Sep 2003 09:41:16 GMT, Brian Sandle posted: In sci.agriculture Mooshie peas wrote: On 28 Aug 2003 23:29:25 GMT, Brian Sandle posted: In sci.agriculture Mooshie peas wrote: On 28 Aug 2003 14:23:53 GMT, Brian Sandle posted: Do you have the database of withdrawn applications and why they were withdrawn? A while back I referred to a submission by Jack Heineman against approval of another organisation's application for GM work in NZ. The other organisation withdrew the application. Was Dr Ingham's work, connected with the EPA, the cause of a dangerous or dubious application being withdrawn? No idea. You'll have to eyeball your regulator's documentation, I would think. That's right, where do they keep the records of withdrawn applications and what has caused the withdrawal? I suspect a bash at Google would find some information about this if it was at all interesting. If you don't find anything, it's likely that there was nothing newsworthy about it. Everything vaguely newsworth is published on the Web, IME I have checked again and http://www.aphis.usda.gov/bbep/ is still not even giving out data for ordinary applications any more. Somehow I think the data about withdrawn applications in USA will be kept covered. Then we won't be able to verify the claim about the withdrawal of the GM Klebsiella application following Ingham's research findings. I suspect that if there was anything to it, you would find much conspiracy theory conjecture on the net. Nothing there? Nothing to it, IMHO. Why conspiracy? Wasn't this just Ingham noting that she was part of the team doing the public research checking on the commercial applications? She was explaining to the commission about pitfalls. The Life Sciences Network decided to pick on her. Like you, they were rather batting off the back foot and made a big public noise about a reference error, rather than dealing with the material itself. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
PROMISING OUTLOOK FOR FUSARIUM WILT RESISTANCE IN PEAS | sci.agriculture | |||
Farmers likely to shy away from Bt cotton - Unhappy over low bollworm resistance | sci.agriculture | |||
Farmers likely to shy away from Bt cotton — Unhappy over low bollworm resistance | sci.agriculture | |||
[Fwd: Widely Used Crop Herbicide Is Losing Weed Resistance] | sci.agriculture | |||
Farmers likely to shy away from Bt cotton — Unhappy over low bollworm resistance | sci.agriculture |