Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Bt pesticide resistance
In sci.med.nutrition Mooshie peas wrote:
======================================= Evidence in Rebuttal - Life Sciences Network 20 February 2001, 9:24 am Press Release: New Zealand Life Sciences Network Conclusion: In conclusion, it is our opinion that Dr Ingham has presented inaccurate, careless and exaggerated information to the Royal Commission; incorrectly interpreting published scientific information and generating speculative doomsday scenarios that are not scientifically supportable. As they want others to be exact so they must be taken at their word. But they leave plenty of room for misunderstanding: In conclusion, it is our opinion that Dr Ingham has presented inaccurate, careless and exaggerated information That could either mean that all the info is classifed that way, or rather that there has been some innacuracy, some lack of care. and futhermore the interesting admission by Life Sciences Network - exaggeration by Ingham's submission. So they are admitting some truth to it just exaggerated. to the Royal Commission; incorrectly interpreting published scientific information and generating speculative doomsday scenarios that are not scientifically supportable. And the tone of that is that it is unlikely to kill off all the plant life on the planet, therefore go ahead with it. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
PROMISING OUTLOOK FOR FUSARIUM WILT RESISTANCE IN PEAS | sci.agriculture | |||
Farmers likely to shy away from Bt cotton - Unhappy over low bollworm resistance | sci.agriculture | |||
Farmers likely to shy away from Bt cotton — Unhappy over low bollworm resistance | sci.agriculture | |||
[Fwd: Widely Used Crop Herbicide Is Losing Weed Resistance] | sci.agriculture | |||
Farmers likely to shy away from Bt cotton — Unhappy over low bollworm resistance | sci.agriculture |