On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 09:45:56 +0100, Oz
wrote:

I have to say that, outside a localised area, I have come across
anything mentioning Hg as a significant hazard; or any hazard at all,
come to that.

Suggest you look at the Food Standards Agency warnings on mercury in
fish as an example:

http://www.foodstandards.gov.uk/mult...q/mercuryfish/

regards
Marcus

On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 06:12:41 +0100, Oz
wrote:

Don't you think that it is a good thing to detoxify slightly
contaminated sites?

Not by dumping elemental mercury into the air, no!

regards
Marcus

writes

On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 09:45:56 +0100, Oz
wrote:

I have to say that, outside a localised area, I have come across
anything mentioning Hg as a significant hazard; or any hazard at all,
come to that.

Suggest you look at the Food Standards Agency warnings on mercury in
fish as an example:

http://www.foodstandards.gov.uk/mult...q/mercuryfish/

Not caused by Hg in the air, you may like to ponder why.

--
Oz
This post is worth absolutely nothing and is probably fallacious.
Note: soon (maybe already) only posts via despammed.com will be accepted.

writes
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 06:12:41 +0100, Oz
wrote:

Don't you think that it is a good thing to detoxify slightly
contaminated sites?

Not by dumping elemental mercury into the air, no!

So where would you like to dump it?

--
Oz
This post is worth absolutely nothing and is probably fallacious.
Note: soon (maybe already) only posts via despammed.com will be accepted.