Planet Ark : EPA Sued Over Children's Exposure to Pesticides

USA: September 16, 2003
http://www.planetark.org/dailynewsst...2243/story.htm

NEW YORK - The Environmental Protection Agency was sued by four states
and a coalition of conservation, public health and farmworker groups
yesterday for failing to protect children from unsafe levels of
pesticide residue found in food.

The plaintiffs, who filed two separate cases in Manhattan federal
court, seek court orders forcing the EPA to comply with a 1996 law
requiring that the agency set pesticide residue standards 10 times
stricter than those considered acceptable for adults.

One of the suits was brought by the attorneys general of New York,
Connecticut, Massachusetts and New Jersey. The other case was brought
by an 11-member group that includes the Natural Resources Defense
Council, Pesticide Action Network North America, the Breast Cancer
Fund, and the Physicians for Social Responsibility.

Both cases focus on a group of high-risk pesticides used on fruits,
vegetables and nuts commonly eaten by children.

"Some of these pesticides are so toxic that a teaspoon can cause acute
poisoning in people, resulting in seizures and coma," the NRDC suit
said.

"One is so potent that the EPA says to protect against acute toxicity,
a toddler should not be exposed to an amount weighing less than a
single grain of salt per day. Lower doses over time may cause
neurological damage, learning disabilities, behavioral problems, and
cancer."

Despite this, the EPA has waived the required tenfold safety factor
for the pesticides, the NRDC charged.

EPA spokesman Dave Deegan said he could not comment specifically on
suits until the lawyers had reviewed the papers, but added, "The EPA
has not deviated from our ongoing efforts to completely implement the
Food Quality Protection Act of 1996."

The suits state that children are far more susceptible to harm from
pesticide residue on food than adults. This is because they are
undergoing rapid growth; do not have mature metabolic functions to
deal with toxic residues and because they consume more food for their
size than adults.

They said that the EPA had based residue limits on data from adults
but that Congress passed the 1996 Food Quality Protection Act to
require the agency to set residue levels that are safe for children.
The act requires the EPA use an additional tenfold margin of safety to
account for the special susceptibility of infants and children when
establishing tolerances for pesticides in food.

The tougher standard can be waived only when there is comprehensive
scientific information showing that a lesser standard is still safe
for children.

Story by Gail Appleson

REUTERS NEWS SERVICE

wrote in message
...

Planet Ark : EPA Sued Over Children's Exposure to Pesticides

any clown can sue, let's wait to see what the courts judgement is :-)

Jim Webster

On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 16:22:49 +0100, "Jim Webster"
wrote:

any clown can sue, let's wait to see what the courts judgement is :-)

Do you support the exposure of children to pesticides at higher than
agreed limits?

regards
Marcus

wrote in message
...

On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 16:22:49 +0100, "Jim Webster"
wrote:

any clown can sue, let's wait to see what the courts judgement is :-)

Do you support the exposure of children to pesticides at higher than
agreed limits?

and how do you draw that rather bizarre conclusion from my comment that we
ought to wait to see what the court decides?

Is this the sort of logic you bring to your study of the GM issue, if so
then I think you really ought to start reading what is written and not some
imaginary text entirely of your own devising

Jim Webster

regards
Marcus