Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 19:29:17 +0100, Jaques d'Alltrades wrote:
AFAICR there were no differences between the Shadow's internals and the Rapide's. choke of carb for one. ummm, mist of time,, was it inch&1/8 for R and inch&1/4 for S ( or perhaps it was inch&1/4 vs. inch&1/2 ?) Compression ratio as well ( or was that just a progression of time thing ? After all, I had just upgraded from an HRD. (as in HRD not HRD-Vincent) Hmmm, I may think of more, like wheel sizes varied quite a bit from time to time and model to model ,,,, Are 19" tyres still available I wonder, they were difficult to get hold of at one time. (Dammit, my Vincent book is still in store...) All mine also, as are a lot of my old braincells :-( Rapide was billed as a 'tourer' and the Shadow as a 'sports model'. Exactly, I ref. hon. gent. to my post earlier about mudguards. gert heavy steel things with skirts on the R. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
In article , michael adams
writes snipped deeply hurtful remarks and cutting asides about whistles, sharks, lifebelts etc etc etc PCTKB? -- Kay "Do not insult the crocodile until you have crossed the river" |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 21:28:10 +0200, martin wrote:
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 17:32:18 GMT, (WaltA) wrote: martin wrote: (WaltA) wrote: PS Those ladies must have strong legs then, not to mention the thighs and,,, ... predictable cycles? :-) ! predictable ? You are the Pope and I claim my 5quid Sorry to disappoint, but we only have papal bull left at this time of year. It's all smoke ;-) (and maybe some mirrors as well) If we thought hard enough we should be able to work in a unicycle here somewhere ? |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
The message
from "michael adams" contains these words: "Janet Baraclough" wrote in message ... The message from "michael adams" contains these words: Oh dear! The depths some people are prepared to sink to, in order to prevent themselves from looking total idiots. I think we've all got your drift. snipped deeply hurtful remarks and cutting asides about whistles, sharks, lifebelts etc etc etc Janet. .... I very much doubt that, somehow. You appear to be totally lacking in any sense of humour whatsoever. /snip/ Now that's funny, coming from you. -- Rusty Emus to: horrid dot squeak snailything zetnet point co full-stop uk http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hi-fi/ |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
The message
from (WaltA) contains these words: On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 19:29:17 +0100, Jaques d'Alltrades wrote: AFAICR there were no differences between the Shadow's internals and the Rapide's. choke of carb for one. ummm, mist of time,, was it inch&1/8 for R and inch&1/4 for S ( or perhaps it was inch&1/4 vs. inch&1/2 ?) Dunno - the Shadow/Lightning had GPs you could crawl down. Compression ratio as well ( or was that just a progression of time thing ? After all, I had just upgraded from an HRD. (as in HRD not HRD-Vincent) Hmmm, I may think of more, like wheel sizes varied quite a bit from time to time and model to model ,,,, Are 19" tyres still available I wonder, they were difficult to get hold of at one time. Yes. The series D Shadow had a 2·25" × 20" front IIRC (Dammit, my Vincent book is still in store...) All mine also, as are a lot of my old braincells :-( Rapide was billed as a 'tourer' and the Shadow as a 'sports model'. Exactly, I ref. hon. gent. to my post earlier about mudguards. gert heavy steel things with skirts on the R. Well, the Black Prince had those. In fact, now you come to mention it, mine was originally one of those enclosed thingies, later Shadowised with ally guards, etc, then stuffed full of goodies. -- Rusty Emus to: horrid dot squeak snailything zetnet point co full-stop uk http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hi-fi/ |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Nick Maclaren wrote:
In article , "Mike Lyle" writes: Nick can explain the stats better than I, and I wish dear old Franz were still with us to describe the physics, but I think it's essentially correct to say it's a matter of what the layman would call "averaging". A localised concentration does nothing to detract from the principle applied globally; and, very interestingly, according to catastrophe theory, may even appear to produce a transitory effect _contrary_ to what a global calculation would predict. As demonstrated by the technology of paraffin refrigerators. Even though I Googled for it I can't find how a paraffin refrigerator works. Anyone? -- Travis in Shoreline Washington |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Travis wrote:
Nick Maclaren wrote: In article , "Mike Lyle" writes: Nick can explain the stats better than I, and I wish dear old Franz were still with us to describe the physics, but I think it's essentially correct to say it's a matter of what the layman would call "averaging". A localised concentration does nothing to detract from the principle applied globally; and, very interestingly, according to catastrophe theory, may even appear to produce a transitory effect _contrary_ to what a global calculation would predict. As demonstrated by the technology of paraffin refrigerators. Even though I Googled for it I can't find how a paraffin refrigerator works. Anyone? Same as a gas one. -- Mike. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 21:33:51 +0100, Jaques d'Alltrades wrote:
snip nostalgia for brevity, all noted. Well, the Black Prince had those. In fact, now you come to mention it, mine was originally one of those enclosed thingies, I had a feeling that you might be talking about the later D series. Ah yes, the one in skirts :-)) As you say, "originally", but like you most real riders soon undressed her. and that transparent plastic thing in front meant you didn't get flys & bees in yer beard like what real riders were supposed to have , heheee. later Shadowised with ally guards, Yep, I mentioned those as well in that post I managed to misfire ! (and now lost to posterity) There was also a fancy stainless set as well wasn't there? Or were they other supplier add-ons ? Tut, how my brain doth fade ! My first were series B - HRD, cos they were cheap s/h ( nobody wanted them ! can you imagine ha ! ) then later series C Vincent-HRDs Oh drool. You'll have me weeping into my beer soon, stoppit :-) Enough of this, go look at my tree bark pictures for your pennance |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
martin wrote: On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 21:57:32 +0100, "Mike Lyle" wrote: Travis wrote: Even though I Googled for it I can't find how a paraffin refrigerator works. Anyone? Same as a gas one. and for those who don't know ... http://www.nh3tech.org/absorption.html Ye gods! That explains why I was about to give the answer to how one works: rather badly. I had never looked up the physics before, but that isn't the sort of technology that is ideal for the conditions we used them in. Not field repairable? When transport from the nearest factory takes several weeks? Not good news. Regards, Nick Maclaren. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
|
#58
|
|||
|
|||
|
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Mike Lyle wrote:
Travis wrote: Nick Maclaren wrote: In article , "Mike Lyle" writes: Nick can explain the stats better than I, and I wish dear old Franz were still with us to describe the physics, but I think it's essentially correct to say it's a matter of what the layman would call "averaging". A localised concentration does nothing to detract from the principle applied globally; and, very interestingly, according to catastrophe theory, may even appear to produce a transitory effect _contrary_ to what a global calculation would predict. As demonstrated by the technology of paraffin refrigerators. Even though I Googled for it I can't find how a paraffin refrigerator works. Anyone? Same as a gas one. Since paraffin is a soild (isn't it) and gas is a gas I don't get it. -- Travis in Shoreline Washington |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
In article DGxOe.10628$g47.7290@trnddc07,
Travis wrote: Since paraffin is a soild (isn't it) and gas is a gas I don't get it. Not at any civilised temperature, it isn't. It is a liquid. You are thinking of paraffin wax. Also don't confuse (liquid) paraffin with liquid paraffin :-) Regards, Nick Maclaren. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
GLOBAL WARMING'S IMPACT ON YOUR GARDEN. | Gardening | |||
Global warming? "Evidence" from my garden? | Gardening | |||
Global warming? "Evidence" from my garden? | United Kingdom |