Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Stuffing our environment
Apologies from the outset if some people don't see this as the correct
newsgroup for the following rant. I have however observed some very sensible people on the group with commonsense advice. Moreover, imo, people who engage themselves in gardening for food generally display some environmental awareness. If the topic isn't appropriate I will take it elsewhere. Also, apologies if my language gets too strong for any. I am despondent at present about the way we treat our earth. We pollute our soil, our water and our air. We spread toxic crap onto the earth, we spread vast amounts of chemicals where we please and farm to deplete the topsoil. We flush all manner of crap in to our water ways and we draw off vast amounts of water to sustain our, imo unsustainable, lifestyles. We pump huge amounts of pollution into our air, we suffer air degredation and poisoining as a result. We create huge amounts of waste, much of it petroleum based, with our throw away lifestyles. I see people landfilling green waste, the earth is awash with plastic bags, we consume things with a shelf life of years or even months. Not content with that we encroach into the few nature areas we have left through deforestation, deep water bottom trawling and the draining of wet lands. A term used is environmental tipping point, where the earth simply gives up. When does gradual degredation turn to breaking point. How big an ecological footprint do people want. If anyone has basic commonsense solutions to some of these issues, ones you can apply to your household, please feel free to raise them. Maybe I will learn something I can do to lessen my impact and reduce my ecological footprint. Thanks for your patience. rob |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Stuffing our environment
rob don't worry. The Earth has been here for 36,000,000,000 years give or
take a year or two and man has only been here the thickness of a coat of paint. Nothing, repeat nothing man can do will destroy this earth, spoilt it yes, but like all wounds, it will heal. Come back in 36 thousand million years and there will be no sign of man's short inhabitance and everything will be OK :-)) Mike |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Stuffing our environment
"Mike" wrote in message ... rob don't worry. The Earth has been here for 36,000,000,000 years give or take a year or two and man has only been here the thickness of a coat of paint. Nothing, repeat nothing man can do will destroy this earth, spoilt it yes, but like all wounds, it will heal. Come back in 36 thousand million years and there will be no sign of man's short inhabitance and everything will be OK :-)) Mike a point of clarification required to my post Mike. Exactly, the earth will exist in some way beyond our existence. My angst is us living within its carrying capacity as opposed to forcing an ecological melt down that all but sends us back to the stone age, thereby giving the earth time and space to recover from our stupidity. The issue of us pulling back before we do root our future existence is the focus of my post. rob |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Stuffing our environment
a point of clarification required to my post Mike. Exactly, the earth will exist in some way beyond our existence. My angst is us living within its carrying capacity as opposed to forcing an ecological melt down that all but sends us back to the stone age, thereby giving the earth time and space to recover from our stupidity. The issue of us pulling back before we do root our future existence is the focus of my post. rob Get rid of money then :-)) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Stuffing our environment
George.com wrote: "Mike" wrote in message ... rob don't worry. The Earth has been here for 36,000,000,000 years give or take a year or two and man has only been here the thickness of a coat of paint. Nothing, repeat nothing man can do will destroy this earth, spoilt it yes, but like all wounds, it will heal. Come back in 36 thousand million years and there will be no sign of man's short inhabitance and everything will be OK :-)) Mike a point of clarification required to my post Mike. Exactly, the earth will exist in some way beyond our existence. My angst is us living within its carrying capacity as opposed to forcing an ecological melt down that all but sends us back to the stone age, thereby giving the earth time and space to recover from our stupidity. The issue of us pulling back before we do root our future existence is the focus of my post. I'm very sympathetic to your pov and I think that people are becoming more and more aware of the need to respect the world in which we live AND its resources. However, I think too, that to all too many such thinking is a luxury because poverty does not tend to enable grand gestures. Nor of course, does greed. I don't begin to have any answers to this but when you have people destroyng rain forest so that they can have land to farm on or timber to sell and at the other end of the scale, a country like USA refusing to sign up to the Kyoto treaty, there's still one helluva struggle going on. Nonetheless, I'm an optimist and I think people in the 'enlightened' world are beginning to get there. -- Sacha www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Stuffing our environment
.. Nonetheless, I'm an
optimist and I think people in the 'enlightened' world are beginning to get there. -- Sacha You must be joking or have your head in the sand. Maybe both. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Stuffing our environment
The message
from "George.com" contains these words: Apologies from the outset if some people don't see this as the correct newsgroup for the following rant. I have however observed some very sensible people on the group with commonsense advice. Moreover, imo, people who engage themselves in gardening for food generally display some environmental awareness. If the topic isn't appropriate I will take it elsewhere. Also, apologies if my language gets too strong for any. I am despondent at present about the way we treat our earth. We pollute our soil, our water and our air. We spread toxic crap onto the earth, we spread vast amounts of chemicals where we please and farm to deplete the topsoil. We flush all manner of crap in to our water ways and we draw off vast amounts of water to sustain our, imo unsustainable, lifestyles. We pump huge amounts of pollution into our air, we suffer air degredation and poisoining as a result. We create huge amounts of waste, much of it petroleum based, with our throw away lifestyles. I see people landfilling green waste, the earth is awash with plastic bags, we consume things with a shelf life of years or even months. Not content with that we encroach into the few nature areas we have left through deforestation, deep water bottom trawling and the draining of wet lands. A term used is environmental tipping point, where the earth simply gives up. When does gradual degredation turn to breaking point. How big an ecological footprint do people want. If anyone has basic commonsense solutions to some of these issues, ones you can apply to your household, please feel free to raise them. Maybe I will learn something I can do to lessen my impact and reduce my ecological footprint. Thanks for your patience. rob Once we have burnt all the oil in around 30 or 40 years. That will make us stop and think just a wee bit more. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Stuffing our environment
"Sacha" wrote in message oups.com... George.com wrote: "Mike" wrote in message ... rob don't worry. The Earth has been here for 36,000,000,000 years give or take a year or two and man has only been here the thickness of a coat of paint. Nothing, repeat nothing man can do will destroy this earth, spoilt it yes, but like all wounds, it will heal. Come back in 36 thousand million years and there will be no sign of man's short inhabitance and everything will be OK :-)) Mike a point of clarification required to my post Mike. Exactly, the earth will exist in some way beyond our existence. My angst is us living within its carrying capacity as opposed to forcing an ecological melt down that all but sends us back to the stone age, thereby giving the earth time and space to recover from our stupidity. The issue of us pulling back before we do root our future existence is the focus of my post. I'm very sympathetic to your pov and I think that people are becoming more and more aware of the need to respect the world in which we live AND its resources. However, I think too, that to all too many such thinking is a luxury because poverty does not tend to enable grand gestures. Nor of course, does greed. I don't begin to have any answers to this but when you have people destroyng rain forest so that they can have land to farm on or timber to sell and at the other end of the scale, a country like USA refusing to sign up to the Kyoto treaty, there's still one helluva struggle going on. Nonetheless, I'm an optimist and I think people in the 'enlightened' world are beginning to get there. too slow, way to slow at present rates I believe to turn round the mess we have made. Sure, people are becoming aware and efforts are being made to clean up some of the damage we have done but that doesn't counter balance the continuing degredation going on around us all. I am more aware than many and I am changing basic things but my lifestyle is masisvely unsustainable. The lack of significant change frustrates the hell out of me. My wife brings back fking plastic bags from the super market by the truck load and doesn't even think about it despite all the times I tell her not to. Its ingrained in collective psyches. It makes me want to throw a brick through someones window. rob |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Stuffing our environment
too slow, way to slow at present rates I believe to turn round the mess we have made. Sure, people are becoming aware and efforts are being made to clean up some of the damage we have done but that doesn't counter balance the continuing degredation going on around us all. I am more aware than many and I am changing basic things but my lifestyle is masisvely unsustainable. The lack of significant change frustrates the hell out of me. My wife brings back fking plastic bags from the super market by the truck load and doesn't even think about it despite all the times I tell her not to. Its ingrained in collective psyches. It makes me want to throw a brick through someones window. rob rob I was recently on a World Cruise and called in at Port Kelang in Malaysia to visit Kuala Lumpur and the road from Port Kelang to KA, the journey takes about an hour, 'was' lined on both sides with Rubber plantations. I say 'was' because for as far as the eye can see, these have been grubbed out, the land built up and houses and houses, and flats and flats and factories and factories are being built. The UK is no longer the manufacturing nation of the world, hasn't been for a long time and what was left, Maggie Thatcher destroyed, the manufacturing is over on the other side of the world and that is why they are ripping the place up to build houses, factories and accommodation. But think on a bit, all of these rubber plantations ripped out. Synthetic unbiodegradeable plastic to replace it? Adding to your concerns? and Sacha says we are now considering the environment more? To coin an ex net nannies favourite expression, "I think not" Look around you in this country. Houses going up on virgin soil and rain which 'did' land on said soil and soak into the water tables, now down the inaddequate drains and into rivers and after flooding the low lands, and the house which have been built on them, out to sea. I wonder why we have a hose pipe ban in force in April ??????????????????? Solution? Get rid of money. Mike |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Stuffing our environment
"Mike" wrote in message ... too slow, way to slow at present rates I believe to turn round the mess we have made. Sure, people are becoming aware and efforts are being made to clean up some of the damage we have done but that doesn't counter balance the continuing degredation going on around us all. I am more aware than many and I am changing basic things but my lifestyle is masisvely unsustainable. The lack of significant change frustrates the hell out of me. My wife brings back fking plastic bags from the super market by the truck load and doesn't even think about it despite all the times I tell her not to. Its ingrained in collective psyches. It makes me want to throw a brick through someones window. rob rob I was recently on a World Cruise and called in at Port Kelang in Malaysia to visit Kuala Lumpur and the road from Port Kelang to KA, the journey takes about an hour, 'was' lined on both sides with Rubber plantations. I say 'was' because for as far as the eye can see, these have been grubbed out, the land built up and houses and houses, and flats and flats and factories and factories are being built. The UK is no longer the manufacturing nation of the world, hasn't been for a long time and what was left, Maggie Thatcher destroyed, the manufacturing is over on the other side of the world and that is why they are ripping the place up to build houses, factories and accommodation. But think on a bit, all of these rubber plantations ripped out. Synthetic unbiodegradeable plastic to replace it? Adding to your concerns? and Sacha says we are now considering the environment more? To coin an ex net nannies favourite expression, "I think not" Look around you in this country. Houses going up on virgin soil and rain which 'did' land on said soil and soak into the water tables, now down the inaddequate drains and into rivers and after flooding the low lands, and the house which have been built on them, out to sea. I wonder why we have a hose pipe ban in force in April ??????????????????? Solution? Get rid of money. Mike all of my roofs drain into soak holes, no storm water. Eventually when I figure out a way they are going to collect water for the garden. Big problem, retrofitting an existing house in an asthetically allowable way. I don't have the luxury of starting from scratch. I will get there and probably a hell of a lot quicker than most others but even then it may be too late. I have a company car which costs me nix to run but requires me to drive for the job. I won't change the job so the gas goes with the car. If things were different I would be driving a 20 year old merc run on waste vege oil. Most people who have the option don't think of it. rob |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Stuffing our environment
I have a company car which costs me nix to run but requires me to
drive for the job. I won't change the job so the gas goes with the car. If things were different I would be driving a 20 year old merc run on waste vege oil. Most people who have the option don't think of it. rob as I said it's money. You are more than likely unable to change your job for financial reasons/committments. You could tell the company that you don't want their car and that they could pay you milage to run your old Merc, BUT, they get a good deal from the Leasing Company to provide you with a car and to pay you milage would be expensive for them, plus, with an old car, the possibility of your unreliability and not earning your keep. Money issues left right and centre there. I organise reunions for ex service people and the company I use did have their own coaches, nice big brand new all singing all dancing ones. They had to be on the road to earn their keep. Not always possible, so the company got rid of them and hire in. I was with the General Manager on Tuesday finalising a reunion in Torquay next weekend. She just send an office email to the coaching manager, '2 coaches Saturday Torquay to Exeter am return pm. Sunday possible coach for sightseeing tour. Don't know how many, will notify Friday night. Get them laid on' No capital expenditure for the company. Money money money again rob I am not argueing with you, I am 100% with you. I have a huge South facing sloping roof and I live on the south part of the Isle of Wight. Water in the garden hose laying around gets too hot for the hand. What could that roof do for my water heating? Even in the winter, behind glass in my garden room it is hot. BUT, money money money again, how long before I get my investment back? ;-)))) Mike |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Stuffing our environment
"Mike" wrote in message ... I have a company car which costs me nix to run but requires me to drive for the job. I won't change the job so the gas goes with the car. If things were different I would be driving a 20 year old merc run on waste vege oil. Most people who have the option don't think of it. rob as I said it's money. You are more than likely unable to change your job for financial reasons/committments. You could tell the company that you don't want their car and that they could pay you milage to run your old Merc, BUT, they get a good deal from the Leasing Company to provide you with a car and to pay you milage would be expensive for them, plus, with an old car, the possibility of your unreliability and not earning your keep. Money issues left right and centre there. I could chuck my job Mike but it is a job I love, provides so many benefits and genuine job satisfaction. Part of that job satisfaction is independance. I had to battle hard to get it. The job does pay well and that is helping us pay down a mortgage at a stupid rapidity. I would work for $20 k less, such is the quality of the job. Once the house is paid off we will renovate and I can look at retro fitting low flow showers, maybe a composting toilet or at least a low water flush, investigate some form of rain water harvesting and grey water usage, higher spec insulation etc. Being a mature house in a mature suburb it needs to fit with existing asthetics, the house needs to retain its value (although I intend being acrried out of here in a box) and the history of the suburb is something I really appreciate. Money does get in the way of somethings. I think those who believe liberal free market capitalism is the 'natural order' of things are naive, such as Robert Fukuyamas book 'The End of History' (although he has since repented). The pathways open to humanity are varied and broad. To me being a socialist these days is very much being an environmentalist. Capitalism may survive, it has a habit of doing that, however the free market will undergo a series of jolts if environmental degredation continues (and I think it will). If we survive I see a world based on localism and local democratisation. Heaven knows at least here, in New Zealand, we are so removed from world economies and our trading markets that we won't be able to be global. We may not end up in the stone age however we may end up with a society 50-100 years back in time in many senses. Stone agism is a worst case scenario, continuing on our merry way with technology and science providing us miracle solutions (is to me fking naive) optimistic. Some of the dull witted libertarians I know think all will be sweetness and light in the future. If we survive in a lower tech/lower horizon world that to me might indicate success. Currently the availability of bio-fuels in New Zealand would account for something like.25% of the current energy demands of our nation. Put another way, it would take 400 years of bio-fuel growth to produce the same energy demands as 2006. rob |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Stuffing our environment
Currently the availability of bio-fuels in New Zealand would account for something like.25% of the current energy demands of our nation. Put another way, it would take 400 years of bio-fuel growth to produce the same energy demands as 2006. rob but rob you are using your natural resources as well which is detrimental to your environment and you are not such a developed (in the industrial/suburban sprawl way) nation. http://www.mikecrowe.photosite.com/a...2ndLeg/?page=4 show the geysers at Rotorua which used to be a lot higher, but as the guide said, 'they are now being used to heat our houses'. What happens when they give up? Mike |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Stuffing our environment
"Mike" wrote in message ... Currently the availability of bio-fuels in New Zealand would account for something like.25% of the current energy demands of our nation. Put another way, it would take 400 years of bio-fuel growth to produce the same energy demands as 2006. rob but rob you are using your natural resources as well which is detrimental to your environment and you are not such a developed (in the industrial/suburban sprawl way) nation. http://www.mikecrowe.photosite.com/a...2ndLeg/?page=4 show the geysers at Rotorua which used to be a lot higher, but as the guide said, 'they are now being used to heat our houses'. What happens when they give up? Mike yeah, thanks Mike, thanks a bunch. It was an article in a magazine pointing out how we are cumitatively rooting NZs environment that threw me into this slough of despondency in the first place. Nice of you to throw me a lifeline, with a lead weight attached. The following discourse is not uk gardening as an advanced warning. More so how NZ is doing environmentally. The geysers are actually doing better than they were 20 years ago. The government capped many many back yard home heating systems as they were drawing off too much thermal heat and dampening down the geysers. They are certainly no where near the level going back 100 years but are showing good signs of good health. In fact, in recent years hot pools and steam vents have started popping up in parks and peoples gardens showing the thermal activity is increasing. If you are talking about using natural resources faster than replacement (sustainability) you are indeed correct. One latest issue is water. In the drier parts of the south island water is being drawn off faster than it is replaced. ancient aquifers are running dry. The water is going in to irrigation for pasture mainly. Show me the logic of that. Other natural resources are being conserved, that is one area NZ is doing quite well. Land and wetlands are being locked away in national parks, native forests no longer logged, increasing marine reserves. We are also starting to invest quite heavily in wind power generation (though still a small % of total demand) although nimbys still exist. One example was the wind turbines may 'scare the horses'. My view on that is short and to the point. Whether this balances up the depletion of natural resources I do not know. I would suspect not however things are getting more in to balance. Eg, we dig up a coal seem but place more land in to a national park or create a new marine reserve. We hunt for more natural gas but also build a large wind farm. More of a concern however is air quality (worsening), water quality (disgusting deterioration), increasing consumer wastes, plastics etc etc. We are cleaning up past decades of DDT, copper, arsenic etc poisoining of land. Good. We continue to pump nitrates into our water ways causing infestations of water weeds. We are a new country with a short history of european colonisation (200 years) however we have gone a long way down the line of environmental degredation. Pity we didn't learn from europe with their centuries of destruction. We seem to emulate it but do so a whole lot quicker. We are still one of, it not the, cleanest country on earth however that is down to our recent development and low population. People are wising up, I just wish they would wise up a hell of a lot faster. rob |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Stuffing our environment
g'day george,
count australia in there as well mate maybe even more so not sure? i did send a reply to your original post 1 via the return format in this program the other i sent to the e/mail addy ) in your original signature line. not sure if you got them (both the same text)? still would welcome chat with you about self changes, up to you i am on the same wave length as you, just think that as important as this topic is these av' garden forums/groups don't generate the sort of open discussion needed to lead to what can be done. you are welcome to contact me through our web site. len http://www.users.bigpond.com/gardenlen1/ "George.com" wrote in message ... "Mike" wrote in message ... Currently the availability of bio-fuels in New Zealand would account for something like.25% of the current energy demands of our nation. Put another way, it would take 400 years of bio-fuel growth to produce the same energy demands as 2006. rob but rob you are using your natural resources as well which is detrimental to your environment and you are not such a developed (in the industrial/suburban sprawl way) nation. http://www.mikecrowe.photosite.com/a...2ndLeg/?page=4 show the geysers at Rotorua which used to be a lot higher, but as the guide said, 'they are now being used to heat our houses'. What happens when they give up? Mike yeah, thanks Mike, thanks a bunch. It was an article in a magazine pointing out how we are cumitatively rooting NZs environment that threw me into this slough of despondency in the first place. Nice of you to throw me a lifeline, with a lead weight attached. The following discourse is not uk gardening as an advanced warning. More so how NZ is doing environmentally. The geysers are actually doing better than they were 20 years ago. The government capped many many back yard home heating systems as they were drawing off too much thermal heat and dampening down the geysers. They are certainly no where near the level going back 100 years but are showing good signs of good health. In fact, in recent years hot pools and steam vents have started popping up in parks and peoples gardens showing the thermal activity is increasing. If you are talking about using natural resources faster than replacement (sustainability) you are indeed correct. One latest issue is water. In the drier parts of the south island water is being drawn off faster than it is replaced. ancient aquifers are running dry. The water is going in to irrigation for pasture mainly. Show me the logic of that. Other natural resources are being conserved, that is one area NZ is doing quite well. Land and wetlands are being locked away in national parks, native forests no longer logged, increasing marine reserves. We are also starting to invest quite heavily in wind power generation (though still a small % of total demand) although nimbys still exist. One example was the wind turbines may 'scare the horses'. My view on that is short and to the point. Whether this balances up the depletion of natural resources I do not know. I would suspect not however things are getting more in to balance. Eg, we dig up a coal seem but place more land in to a national park or create a new marine reserve. We hunt for more natural gas but also build a large wind farm. More of a concern however is air quality (worsening), water quality (disgusting deterioration), increasing consumer wastes, plastics etc etc. We are cleaning up past decades of DDT, copper, arsenic etc poisoining of land. Good. We continue to pump nitrates into our water ways causing infestations of water weeds. We are a new country with a short history of european colonisation (200 years) however we have gone a long way down the line of environmental degredation. Pity we didn't learn from europe with their centuries of destruction. We seem to emulate it but do so a whole lot quicker. We are still one of, it not the, cleanest country on earth however that is down to our recent development and low population. People are wising up, I just wish they would wise up a hell of a lot faster. rob |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Doing Our Bit for the Environment | United Kingdom | |||
From those wishing to reclaim our rights to post on our fish andpond groups without disruption or games | Ponds | |||
Daily wildlife & environment news from the British Isles - Habitat April 21st | Plant Science |