Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Garden Banter and email addresses
Hi,
I have just been contacted by an email from someone on Garden Banter. The thing that is puzzling me is that I didn't think my email address was visible on NGs. It is possible that I have a registration on Garden Banter which allows forwarding of emails, but I can't find any record of it. So I am puzzled - unless the person in question is an Internet sleuth and has cross referenced me with some other source of information. Any ideas? Cheers Dave R -- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Garden Banter and email addresses
David W.E. Roberts wrote: Hi, I have just been contacted by an email from someone on Garden Banter. The thing that is puzzling me is that I didn't think my email address was visible on NGs. It is possible that I have a registration on Garden Banter which allows forwarding of emails, but I can't find any record of it. So I am puzzled - unless the person in question is an Internet sleuth and has cross referenced me with some other source of information. Your email address is indeed accessible to anyone reading GardenBanter. If they click on view headers, they're taken to a page which displays a code they have to type in to prove they're a person and not a 'harvesting machine' but then they get your address. The msg. they see is: "Newsgroup message headers contain the email address of the poster. To combat automated email harvesting (and the subsequent spam), please enter the image verification text below which demonstrates you are not a machine: " and below this is a box with a random letter code in it. -- Sacha www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Garden Banter and email addresses
In article , "David W.E. Roberts" writes: | | So I am puzzled - unless the person in question is an Internet sleuth and | has cross referenced me with some other source of information. Well, Google alone gets a plausible Email (two, actually, but I assume the South Park one is you). Regards, Nick Maclaren. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Garden Banter and email addresses
In article .com, "Sacha" writes: | | Your email address is indeed accessible to anyone reading GardenBanter. | If they click on view headers, they're taken to a page which displays | a code they have to type in to prove they're a person and not a | 'harvesting machine' but then they get your address. | The msg. they see is: | "Newsgroup message headers contain the email address of the poster. To | combat automated email harvesting (and the subsequent spam), please | enter the image verification text below which demonstrates you are not | a machine: " | and below this is a box with a random letter code in it. Well, a BanterBot wouldn't be that hard to write, then :-) Regards, Nick Maclaren. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Garden Banter and email addresses
"Nick Maclaren" wrote in message ... In article , "David W.E. Roberts" writes: | | So I am puzzled - unless the person in question is an Internet sleuth and | has cross referenced me with some other source of information. Well, Google alone gets a plausible Email (two, actually, but I assume the South Park one is you). Nick, I was found by Google - I hadn't realised just how much of my online traffic was visible this way. I have quickly found three of my 'real' email addresses. The South Park one is defunct - I dropped quite a few addresses when Talk21 became no longer free. One other is spammed to death anyway and is one I generally use if I think there is a risk of the address being exposed. The third address is one I didn't think I had exposed to the Internet. Ho hum. My normal return address is ' which is (or at least was) specifically maintained by Talk21 as a valid email sink. I may now have to Google all my email addresses to see which ones are visible. Cheers Dave R |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Garden Banter and email addresses
I'm confused - isn't it easy to see anyones e-mail address by simply
clicking on their name after they have sent a post? -- Hayley (gardening on well drained, alkaline clay in Somerset) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Garden Banter and email addresses
In message , H Ryder
writes I'm confused - isn't it easy to see anyones e-mail address by simply clicking on their name after they have sent a post? Well, how you see their address, depends on how you view the posts. Here, my newsreader displays the email addresses used by a poster when I view message - of course the email address used may not be valid. -- Chris French |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Garden Banter and email addresses
"David W.E. Roberts" wrote in message ... "Nick Maclaren" wrote in message ... In article , "David W.E. Roberts" writes: | | So I am puzzled - unless the person in question is an Internet sleuth and | has cross referenced me with some other source of information. Well, Google alone gets a plausible Email (two, actually, but I assume the South Park one is you). Nick, I was found by Google - I hadn't realised just how much of my online traffic was visible this way. I have quickly found three of my 'real' email addresses. The South Park one is defunct - I dropped quite a few addresses when Talk21 became no longer free. One other is spammed to death anyway and is one I generally use if I think there is a risk of the address being exposed. The third address is one I didn't think I had exposed to the Internet. Ho hum. My normal return address is ' which is (or at least was) specifically maintained by Talk21 as a valid email sink. I may now have to Google all my email addresses to see which ones are visible. This is worrying, my email address does not appear in the heading as to often in the past it has been used to generate spam emails, if there is a method of finding email addresses when we all try to stop junk mail, is there any point in doing that. -- Alan Reply to alan (dot) holmes27 (at) virgin (dot) net |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Garden Banter and email addresses
"H Ryder" wrote in message ... I'm confused - isn't it easy to see anyones e-mail address by simply clicking on their name after they have sent a post? -- Hayley (gardening on well drained, alkaline clay in Somerset) I use a special email address ' for Usenet postings because bad people harvest email addresses from newsgroup postings and then sell them to spammers. In general you should use a known valid email address, but not one belonging to someone who hasn't given permission. [The point of the known valid email address being that if you make up one it is quite likely that it already exists or will do soon]. ' is an email sink especially provided for this kind of use. HTH Dave R |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Garden Banter and email addresses
David W.E. Roberts wrote:
I use a special email address ' for Usenet postings because bad people harvest email addresses from newsgroup postings and then sell them to spammers. In just over year, I bet I've had about 300 "spam" e-mails, most of which (IMO) have come from non-Usenet sources. There are only about a hundred people on usenet, anyway, so it's not a prime resource for e-mail address "harvesting". |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Garden Banter and email addresses
In message , Alan Holmes
writes This is worrying, my email address Well *an* email address that appears to be yours does. does not appear in the heading as to often in the past it has been used to generate spam emails, if there is a method of finding email addresses when we all try to stop junk mail, is there any point in doing that. Yes, because spam email addresses are collected by computers, hence they use easy targets such as newsgroups, forums (though mostly they are hidden nowadays), addresses that people put on web pages etc. It doesn't mean that all email addresses are easily searched for on the web. I've just tried, and only a few of our addresses show up on Google, and all of those are expected. To be able to Google up an email addresses it must have got onto a web page first -- Chris French |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Garden Banter and email addresses
"Chris Bacon" wrote after David W.E. Roberts wrote: I use a special email address ' for Usenet postings because bad people harvest email addresses from newsgroup postings and then sell them to spammers. In just over year, I bet I've had about 300 "spam" e-mails, most of which (IMO) have come from non-Usenet sources. There are only about a hundred people on usenet, anyway, so it's not a prime resource for e-mail address "harvesting". Lucky you, when I came back from a week away recently I had 47 real mails and 584 spam. -- Regards Bob Hobden 17mls W. of London.UK |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Garden Banter and email addresses
"Chris Bacon" wrote in message ... David W.E. Roberts wrote: I use a special email address ' for Usenet postings because bad people harvest email addresses from newsgroup postings and then sell them to spammers. In just over year, I bet I've had about 300 "spam" e-mails, most of which (IMO) have come from non-Usenet sources. There are only about a hundred people on usenet, anyway, so it's not a prime resource for e-mail address "harvesting". 100 people on Usenet? I should have thought there were more than that using this newsgroup alone. Thanks to mail washer I no longer have a problem with Spam and if people want to waste their time sending it I don't care -- Charlie, gardening in Cornwall. http://www.roselandhouse.co.uk Holders of National Plant Collection of Clematis viticella (cvs) |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Garden Banter and email addresses
In article , Chris Bacon writes: | | In just over year, I bet I've had about 300 "spam" e-mails, most of | which (IMO) have come from non-Usenet sources. There are only about | a hundred people on usenet, anyway, so it's not a prime resource | for e-mail address "harvesting". Er, are you SURE? Try a hundred thousand. Regards, Nick Maclaren. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Garden Banter and email addresses
"Chris Bacon" wrote in message ... David W.E. Roberts wrote: I use a special email address ' for Usenet postings because bad people harvest email addresses from newsgroup postings and then sell them to spammers. In just over year, I bet I've had about 300 "spam" e-mails, most of which (IMO) have come from non-Usenet sources. There are only about a hundred people on usenet, anyway, so it's not a prime resource for e-mail address "harvesting". I think you are a little short on the number of people using the internet, if you added about 10 '0's to your estimate it would be a little closer. Alan |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|