Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Care to answer this question?
Care to answer this question?
Is Conservation and Sustainability a Deliberate Con? I have been examining claims made by "conservation" organisations and have found most are engaged in, and encouraging, environmentally damaging activities akin to the tourist industry, that increases the consumption of finite resources, increases emissions, and is responsible for expanding the human footprint All to fund their existence in one way or another! None can be more evident than the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds' news release of February 2005, in which they said "cooking our planet will disrupt and devastate all life and giving this process the cosy name global warming only makes it easier for all of us, especially politicians, to ignore the consequences", yet at the same time they were accepting pages of world wide travel advertisements in their Birds magazine. It seems that where money is to be made, conservation and sustainability slides out of sight. Delving a little further, one must question whether the whole conservation industry and our government's claim to be on target for emission reduction is a con from top to bottom. Over 150 countries, including the UK, committed themselves to reducing emissions in terms of the Kyoto Protocol. However, despite making claims to be "on-target", it appears that one major factor is being deliberately avoided which could leave our emission reduction claims in shreds.. The Kyoto Protocol exempts emerging economies from emission control but their industrial revolution is expanding exponentially on the back of exports to the West. So the question is: If we, in the UK, claim to counter some of our domestic emissions by planting trees in Africa, why don't we acknowledge our responsibility for emissions by the emerging economies for goods produced there and transported here for consumption in this country? Angus Macmillan www.roots-of-blood.org.uk www.killhunting.org www.con-servation.org.uk All truth passes through three stages: First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; and Third, it is accepted as self-evident. -- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Garden Gnomes care about the environment? Obviously not! Take legal action against fishing groups, under the duty of care rule. | United Kingdom | |||
Good morning or good evening depending upon your location. I want to ask you the most important question of your life. Your joy or sorrow for all eternity depends upon your answer. The question is: Are you saved? It is not a question of how good | United Kingdom | |||
quick question needing quick answer: what lighting? | Freshwater Aquaria Plants | |||
quick question needing quick answer: what lighting? | Freshwater Aquaria Plants | |||
quick question needing quick answer: what lighting? | Freshwater Aquaria Plants |