Charity Commission Direct
PO Box 1227
Liverpool
LE69 3UG


Dear Sir

The Woodland Trust

According to charity data from CaritasData, the Woodland Trust is
spending 46.63% of its voluntary income on fundraising costs while the
Salvation Army spends only 2.11%

However, this is not the only comparison: Of their voluntary income
the National Trust spends 4.59%, the RSPB 9.6% and the John Muir Trust
14.99% on fundraising. These organisations are very much in the same
business as the Woodland Trust so why the huge difference?

And should those who donate to it not be made aware that almost half
of the money they subscribe is not going directly towards the Trust's
objectives?

I am also concerned that the valuations of the Woodland Trust's
"assets" might not reflect the liabilities incurred. After all, who
would want to buy woodlands that are for public recreation with all
the maintenance and liabilities involved? They probably have little
or no commercial value.

I do think the Woodland Trust's fundraising costs and property
valuations need to be investigated.


Yours faithfully
Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident.
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

wrote in message
...
The Woodland Trust

According to charity data from CaritasData, the Woodland Trust is
spending 46.63% of its voluntary income on fundraising costs while the
Salvation Army spends only 2.11%

What do they spend it on? Not keeping people signed up as members, it would
seem.

For Christmas 2005, someone gave me a year's subscription as a gift. You'd
have thought that when that membership was about to expire, they'd send me
something inviting me to pay up myself in order to keep the membership
going. Nope. Not a thing. An opportunity lost for them. and it would have
been a very cheap renewal for them.