URG
 

Never say never but for now, I'm taking a break from urg. The days are long
gone when we could all have a bit of light-hearted humour, talk a little
about our families and our lives - some members even posted up web site
photos, nobody would dare do that now - and frankly, it's too wearing to be
constantly sniped at or have posts distorted and quoted months later but out
of context. Once Jenny, who has no children, posted details of my
children's identities here, I knew I would be the target for every chip on
every shoulder and that has now proved to be the case. Thank you, Jenny. I
hope one day you will get your just reward but you will, I hope, notice
that I have never revealed any of the many personal details about yourself
that you sent to me in email.
Puce's remarks about my daughters and her supposed 'innocence' on that and
many other matters that affect me really are too dishonest for mere words to
express. Others have suffered from her far worse than I have and like me,
have had enough. It's no good saying 'ignore her', because of the lies and
distortions she posts here or via emails. She has claimed people here have
emailed her with gossip or nasty remarks about each other and of course,
nobody can prove whether it's true or not. It is becoming rare for me and
some others to be able to post without her or one of her 'gang' making some
unpleasant remark or snide jibe.
IMO, she has wrecked this group and introduced a truly poisonous atmosphere
of distrust.
I see no reason to endanger my family and like any other mother, I put my
children first, last and always. Now that they are being used to attack me,
I have no choice but to protect them as best I can.
If anyone here ever starts a moderated group, I'll be happy to contribute
what I can.
So I'm leaving for now but will keep in touch with friends via email. I'm
trying to change that address but will let my friends know my new one. To
those of you who made it fun, thank you.
--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/
(remove weeds from address)

URG
 

Please stay, at least until the end of April.

Thank you

Mike


--
.................................................. .........
Royal Naval Electrical Branch Association
www.rnshipmates.co.uk
www.nsrafa.com
"Sacha" wrote in message
. uk...
Never say never but for now, I'm taking a break from urg. The days are
long
gone when we could all have a bit of light-hearted humour, talk a little
about our families and our lives - some members even posted up web site
photos, nobody would dare do that now - and frankly, it's too wearing to
be
constantly sniped at or have posts distorted and quoted months later but
out
of context. Once Jenny, who has no children, posted details of my
children's identities here, I knew I would be the target for every chip on
every shoulder and that has now proved to be the case. Thank you, Jenny.
I
hope one day you will get your just reward but you will, I hope, notice
that I have never revealed any of the many personal details about yourself
that you sent to me in email.
Puce's remarks about my daughters and her supposed 'innocence' on that and
many other matters that affect me really are too dishonest for mere words
to
express. Others have suffered from her far worse than I have and like me,
have had enough. It's no good saying 'ignore her', because of the lies and
distortions she posts here or via emails. She has claimed people here
have
emailed her with gossip or nasty remarks about each other and of course,
nobody can prove whether it's true or not. It is becoming rare for me and
some others to be able to post without her or one of her 'gang' making
some
unpleasant remark or snide jibe.
IMO, she has wrecked this group and introduced a truly poisonous
atmosphere
of distrust.
I see no reason to endanger my family and like any other mother, I put my
children first, last and always. Now that they are being used to attack
me,
I have no choice but to protect them as best I can.
If anyone here ever starts a moderated group, I'll be happy to contribute
what I can.
So I'm leaving for now but will keep in touch with friends via email. I'm
trying to change that address but will let my friends know my new one. To
those of you who made it fun, thank you.
--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/
(remove weeds from address)

URG
 

In message , Sacha
writes
Never say never but for now, I'm taking a break from urg.

Does that mean you will be posting more on ukfd?
--
June Hughes

URG
 

On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 08:01:42 +0000, Sacha
wrote:

Never say never but for now, I'm taking a break from urg.

Here we go. Translation "I don't wanna play no more, and I am gonna
take the ball home even though it aint mine"

The days are long
gone when we could all have a bit of light-hearted humour, talk a little
about our families and our lives - some members even posted up web site
photos, nobody would dare do that now

Yes they do. You miserable old crow. Get over yourself. You got caught
out playing the bitch once too often, and now you're sulking!

snip crybaby trash talk
--


Avoid the rush at the last judgement. Be converted now instead!




Disclaimer

Pete has taken all reasonable care to ensure that pages published by him
were accurate on the date of publication or last modification.
Other pages which may be linked or which Pete may have published are in
a personal capacity. Pete takes no responsibility for the consequences
of error or for any loss or damage suffered by users of any of the information
published on any of these pages, and such information does not form any
basis of a contract with readers or users of it.

It is in the nature of Usenet & Web sites, that much of the information is
experimental or constantly changing, that information published may
be for test purposes only, may be out of date, or may be the personal
opinion of the author.
Readers should verify information gained from the Web/Usenet with the appropriate
authorities before relying on it.

Should you no longer wish to read this material or content, please use your
newsreaders kill filter.

URG
 

On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 08:01:42 +0000, Sacha wrote
(in article ) :

Never say never but for now, I'm taking a break from urg. The days are long
gone when we could all have a bit of light-hearted humour, talk a little
about our families and our lives - some members even posted up web site
photos, nobody would dare do that now - and frankly, it's too wearing to be
constantly sniped at or have posts distorted and quoted months later but out
of context.

Sacha, I just wanted to say that I for one will be sorry to see you go, and
perhaps you might change your mind, if not now then perhaps in the near
future. Surely it is better not to let anyone who particularly troubles you
be the victor in this but to take steps not to let them trouble you. I read
this NG for information, occasionally to offer information if I think I can,
and a little for entertainment. There are two people in this group who do
not offer me either information or entertainment, and I have found life much
sunnier just to KF them. My life (and I'm not alone in this!) is too busy to
care to read spite, and I only see the spiteful postings when others quote
them.

snip

IMO, she has wrecked this group and introduced a truly poisonous atmosphere
of distrust.

No argument there.


--
Sally in Shropshire, UK
bed and breakfast near Ludlow: http://www.stonybrook-ludlow.co.uk
Burne-Jones/William Morris window in Shropshire church:
http://www.whitton-stmarys.org.uk

URG
 

On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 09:45:46 +0000, Sally Thompson
wrote:

Sacha, I just wanted to say that I for one will be sorry to see you go, and
perhaps you might change your mind, if not now then perhaps in the near
future. Surely it is better not to let anyone who particularly troubles you
be the victor in this but to take steps not to let them trouble you. I read
this NG for information, occasionally to offer information if I think I can,
and a little for entertainment. There are two people in this group who do
not offer me either information or entertainment, and I have found life much
sunnier just to KF them. My life (and I'm not alone in this!) is too busy to
care to read spite, and I only see the spiteful postings when others quote
them.


Agreed 100%


snip

IMO, she has wrecked this group and introduced a truly poisonous atmosphere
of distrust.

No argument there.

Agreed 100%

URG
 

On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 09:36:33 +0000, "Pete ‹(•¿•)›"
wrote:

childish comments removed

The value of your opinion is demonstrated by the content of your
multiple cross-postings in other threads.
You can hardly complain about another's behaviour while you abuse
usenet so comprehensively.

URG
 

"charles" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 09:45:46 +0000, Sally Thompson
wrote:

IMO, she has wrecked this group and introduced a truly poisonous
atmosphere
of distrust.

No argument there.

Agreed 100%

I'll add my 100% to that.


--
Chris, West Cork, Ireland.

URG
 

"charles" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 09:36:33 +0000, "Pete (.¿.)"
wrote:

childish comments removed

The value of your opinion is demonstrated by the content of your
multiple cross-postings in other threads.
You can hardly complain about another's behaviour while you abuse
usenet so comprehensively.

Pete has prime place in my killfile.


--
Chris, West Cork, Ireland.

URG
 

"Sally Thompson" wrote
Sacha, I just wanted to say that I for one will be sorry to see you
go, and perhaps you might change your mind, if not now then perhaps in
the near future. Surely it is better not to let anyone who
particularly troubles you be the victor in this but to take steps not
to let them trouble you.

Absolutely. I agree.

I read this NG for information, occasionally to offer information if I
think I can, and a little for entertainment. There are two people in
this group who do not offer me either information or entertainment, and
I have found life much sunnier just to KF them. My life (and I'm not
alone in this!) is too busy to care to read spite, and I only see the
spiteful postings when others quote them.
snip

I don't killfile anyone, but those two have behaved despicably over and
over again IMO. And others dragging in their stupid grudges from other
ngs into every disagreement here is quite pathetic.

IMO, she has wrecked this group and introduced a truly poisonous
atmosphere
of distrust.

No argument there.

Nor here. Except that poisonous isn't strong enough a word!

--
Sue

URG
 

On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 11:17:37 +0000, charles
wrote:

On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 09:36:33 +0000, "Pete ‹(•¿•)›"
wrote:

childish comments removed

The value of your opinion is demonstrated by the content of your
multiple cross-postings in other threads.
You can hardly complain about another's behaviour while you abuse
usenet so comprehensively.

Not much one can say to that, apart from **** OFF TROLL!


--


Avoid the rush at the last judgement. Be converted now instead!




Disclaimer

Pete has taken all reasonable care to ensure that pages published by him
were accurate on the date of publication or last modification.
Other pages which may be linked or which Pete may have published are in
a personal capacity. Pete takes no responsibility for the consequences
of error or for any loss or damage suffered by users of any of the information
published on any of these pages, and such information does not form any
basis of a contract with readers or users of it.

It is in the nature of Usenet & Web sites, that much of the information is
experimental or constantly changing, that information published may
be for test purposes only, may be out of date, or may be the personal
opinion of the author.
Readers should verify information gained from the Web/Usenet with the appropriate
authorities before relying on it.

Should you no longer wish to read this material or content, please use your
newsreaders kill filter.

URG
 

On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 12:02:46 -0000, "Cerumen"
wrote:


"charles" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 09:36:33 +0000, "Pete (.¿.)"
wrote:

childish comments removed

The value of your opinion is demonstrated by the content of your
multiple cross-postings in other threads.
You can hardly complain about another's behaviour while you abuse
usenet so comprehensively.

Pete has prime place in my killfile.

Thanks. Not sure about the company though!
--


Avoid the rush at the last judgement. Be converted now instead!




Disclaimer

Pete has taken all reasonable care to ensure that pages published by him
were accurate on the date of publication or last modification.
Other pages which may be linked or which Pete may have published are in
a personal capacity. Pete takes no responsibility for the consequences
of error or for any loss or damage suffered by users of any of the information
published on any of these pages, and such information does not form any
basis of a contract with readers or users of it.

It is in the nature of Usenet & Web sites, that much of the information is
experimental or constantly changing, that information published may
be for test purposes only, may be out of date, or may be the personal
opinion of the author.
Readers should verify information gained from the Web/Usenet with the appropriate
authorities before relying on it.

Should you no longer wish to read this material or content, please use your
newsreaders kill filter.

URG
 

"Sacha" wrote in message
. uk...
Never say never but for now, I'm taking a break from urg. The days are
long
gone when we could all have a bit of light-hearted humour, talk a little
about our families and our lives - some members even posted up web site
photos, nobody would dare do that now - and frankly, it's too wearing to
be
constantly sniped at or have posts distorted and quoted months later but
out
of context. Once Jenny, who has no children, posted details of my
children's identities here, I knew I would be the target for every chip on
every shoulder and that has now proved to be the case. Thank you, Jenny.
I
hope one day you will get your just reward but you will, I hope, notice
that I have never revealed any of the many personal details about yourself
that you sent to me in email.
Puce's remarks about my daughters and her supposed 'innocence' on that and
many other matters that affect me really are too dishonest for mere words
to
express. Others have suffered from her far worse than I have and like me,
have had enough. It's no good saying 'ignore her', because of the lies and
distortions she posts here or via emails. She has claimed people here
have
emailed her with gossip or nasty remarks about each other and of course,
nobody can prove whether it's true or not. It is becoming rare for me and
some others to be able to post without her or one of her 'gang' making
some
unpleasant remark or snide jibe.
IMO, she has wrecked this group and introduced a truly poisonous
atmosphere
of distrust.
I see no reason to endanger my family and like any other mother, I put my
children first, last and always. Now that they are being used to attack
me,
I have no choice but to protect them as best I can.
If anyone here ever starts a moderated group, I'll be happy to contribute
what I can.
So I'm leaving for now but will keep in touch with friends via email. I'm
trying to change that address but will let my friends know my new one. To
those of you who made it fun, thank you.
--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/
(remove weeds from address)


I came to this group to gain knowledge from others experience of gardening.
The advice, expertise and wit on offer are the poorer with departure of
notables such as Janet Baraclough, Sacha, Cormaic and the like.
Chris S

URG
 

"Sacha" wrote in message
. uk...

You could carry on reading the group, just killfile those who irritate you,
just as I have done, you could still offer those of us left, the benefit of
your experience.

Alan

URG
 

"charles" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 09:36:33 +0000, "Pete (.¿.)"
wrote:

childish comments removed

The value of your opinion is demonstrated by the content of your
multiple cross-postings in other threads.
You can hardly complain about another's behaviour while you abuse
usenet so comprehensively.

Who the hell is 'Pete'?