Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
:-((Off we go again :-((
On 28 Aug, 21:50, "Rupert \(W.Yorkshire\)"
wrote: Please don't forget me in the list of the many people with whom you have had serious quarrels. Mike Crowe is just a harmless buffoon but you and the advice you give are downright dangerous. giggle You didn't like me telling you that I had found you in a Sex Forum where people were telling each others their life experience stories. That's why you don't like me. As for advice, what advices?! You have never given any but give the usual response "I don't know, but someone here will help you soon I'm sure". Great advice indeed Rupert - and that's not your name. And as for Mike he is certainly friendlier and funnier than you will ever be. Calling him what you have just done - well, you still have Alan Holmes as a friend ... who am I trying to convince here?! LOL!! |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
:-((Off we go again :-((
On 29 Aug, 00:26, Sacha wrote:
I'm the only person you've fallen out with here? Good lord above. I've fallen out with nobody here Sacha. I've had quarells with you and you alone. The rest are discussions. I've met many urglers too - I've even answered to two emails today. Now, ask yourself why they don't post on this forum but contact me via email? You're so deluded, it's painful - but it gives us something to laugh at. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
:-((Off we go again :-((
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 15:51:43 +0100, Alan Holmes wrote
(in article ): "Sacha" wrote in message . uk... On 27/8/07 19:21, in article , "La Puce" wrote: On 27 Aug, 18:50, Sacha wrote: Not if you're replying to Mike Crowe you haven't. He stirs up trouble on every group he posts to and it's my belief he gets off on it. The posts he has made in this thread he has started are a perfect example. He's in most peoples' kill files so the only way he can get attention is to try to encourage others to fight and argue and for the unwary to respond to him. He's a vile piece of work. snip usual diatribe from Puce Well, I'd rather be friend with the real folks around here and with Mike Crowe anytime. Note that I've never had quarells with anybody but you. This surely is telling. It's very telling, Puce. It's telling us that you wouldn't recognise truth if it bit you. I'm the only person you've fallen out with here? Good lord above. She cannot fall out with me cos I killfiled La Puke a long time ago! Me too! I think it is possible that Puce thinks that because Sacha is one of the few who takes the time and trouble to reply, that everyone else is in agreement with her (Puce, not Sacha). The opposite is far more likely. There are only two people on urg in my killfile (not that I expect anyone else to be interested) and the other one is Mike Crowe. Life is a lot sweeter since I did that. -- Sally in Shropshire, UK Burne-Jones/William Morris window in Shropshire church with conservation churchyard: http://www.whitton-stmarys.org.uk |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
:-((Off we go again :-((
"Sally Thompson" wrote in message al.net... On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 15:51:43 +0100, Alan Holmes wrote (in article ): "Sacha" wrote in message . uk... On 27/8/07 19:21, in article , "La Puce" wrote: On 27 Aug, 18:50, Sacha wrote: Not if you're replying to Mike Crowe you haven't. He stirs up trouble on every group he posts to and it's my belief he gets off on it. The posts he has made in this thread he has started are a perfect example. He's in most peoples' kill files so the only way he can get attention is to try to encourage others to fight and argue and for the unwary to respond to him. He's a vile piece of work. snip usual diatribe from Puce Well, I'd rather be friend with the real folks around here and with Mike Crowe anytime. Note that I've never had quarells with anybody but you. This surely is telling. It's very telling, Puce. It's telling us that you wouldn't recognise truth if it bit you. I'm the only person you've fallen out with here? Good lord above. She cannot fall out with me cos I killfiled La Puke a long time ago! Me too! I think it is possible that Puce thinks that because Sacha is one of the few who takes the time and trouble to reply, that everyone else is in agreement with her (Puce, not Sacha). The opposite is far more likely. There are only two people on urg in my killfile (not that I expect anyone else to be interested) and the other one is Mike Crowe. Life is a lot sweeter since I did that. -- Sally in Shropshire, UK and as my main aim in life is to make people happy and I succeed in 99.99% case out of a 100, I know I succeed. However as the saying goes, "You can please some of the people some of the time and You can please most of the people most of the time But you cannot please ALL of the people ALL of the time" and as I can count up the people who do not like me on less than a handful, I regard 'them' to have a problem :-)) Not me, or the hundreds of friends I have :-)) SO delighted you live a sweet life and I have no desire to add to whatever problems you DO have in life :-)) Perhaps someone who DOES still exist off her killfile would convey that message? Kindest regards to those lurkers who support my actions and read the 'good advice' given on this newsgroup. What a pity that they do not wish to contribute to such a 'closed newsgroup' :-(((( Can those who "own the newsgroup" or feel they "own the newsgroup" not see the folly of their ways? Do please have a pleasant evening everyone :-)) I will Life is toooooooooooooooooooo short to be sad :-)) Mike More friends than not by a hundredfold. :-)))) -- The Royal Naval Electrical Branch Association. 'THE' Association if you served in the Electrical Branch of the Royal Navy Reunion Bournemouth August/September 2007 FULL. WAIT LIST OPERATING www.rneba.org.uk to find your ex-Greenie mess mates www.iowtours.com for all ex-Service Reunions. More being added daily "Navy Days" Portsmouth 25th - 27th July 2008. RN Shipmates will have a Stand |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
:-((Off we go again :-((
On Aug 29, 5:18 pm, Sally Thompson
wrote: On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 15:51:43 +0100, Alan Holmes wrote (in article ): "Sacha" wrote in message .uk... On 27/8/07 19:21, in article m, "La Puce" wrote: On 27 Aug, 18:50, Sacha wrote: Not if you're replying to Mike Crowe you haven't. He stirs up trouble on every group he posts to and it's my belief he gets off on it. The posts he has made in this thread he has started are a perfect example. He's in most peoples' kill files so the only way he can get attention is to try to encourage others to fight and argue and for the unwary to respond to him. He's a vile piece of work. snip usual diatribe from Puce Well, I'd rather be friend with the real folks around here and with Mike Crowe anytime. Note that I've never had quarells with anybody but you. This surely is telling. It's very telling, Puce. It's telling us that you wouldn't recognise truth if it bit you. I'm the only person you've fallen out with here? Good lord above. She cannot fall out with me cos I killfiled La Puke a long time ago! Me too! I think it is possible that Puce thinks that because Sacha is one of the few who takes the time and trouble to reply, that everyone else is in agreement with her (Puce, not Sacha). The opposite is far more likely. There are only two people on urg in my killfile (not that I expect anyone else to be interested) and the other one is Mike Crowe. Life is a lot sweeter since I did that. -- Sally in Shropshire, UK Burne-Jones/William Morris window in Shropshire church with conservation churchyard:http://www.whitton-stmarys.org.uk- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hi Sally, how are you? Poor dear Sacha, she will always have a problem with certain people, why? Simply because she has such expert knowledge and what she doesn't know, she will readily ask Ray, and she will also acknowledge that he is the provider of the information. Rock on Sacha - we love you. Judith |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
:-((Off we go again :-((
On Aug 29, 5:56 pm, "'Mike'" wrote:
"Sally Thompson" wrote in message al.net... On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 15:51:43 +0100, Alan Holmes wrote (in article ): "Sacha" wrote in message o.uk... On 27/8/07 19:21, in article m, "La Puce" wrote: On 27 Aug, 18:50, Sacha wrote: Not if you're replying to Mike Crowe you haven't. He stirs up trouble on every group he posts to and it's my belief he gets off on it. The posts he has made in this thread he has started are a perfect example. He's in most peoples' kill files so the only way he can get attention is to try to encourage others to fight and argue and for the unwary to respond to him. He's a vile piece of work. snip usual diatribe from Puce Well, I'd rather be friend with the real folks around here and with Mike Crowe anytime. Note that I've never had quarells with anybody but you. This surely is telling. It's very telling, Puce. It's telling us that you wouldn't recognise truth if it bit you. I'm the only person you've fallen out with here? Good lord above. She cannot fall out with me cos I killfiled La Puke a long time ago! Me too! I think it is possible that Puce thinks that because Sacha is one of the few who takes the time and trouble to reply, that everyone else is in agreement with her (Puce, not Sacha). The opposite is far more likely. There are only two people on urg in my killfile (not that I expect anyone else to be interested) and the other one is Mike Crowe. Life is a lot sweeter since I did that. -- Sally in Shropshire, UK and as my main aim in life is to make people happy and I succeed in 99.99% case out of a 100, I know I succeed. However as the saying goes, "You can please some of the people some of the time and You can please most of the people most of the time But you cannot please ALL of the people ALL of the time" and as I can count up the people who do not like me on less than a handful, I regard 'them' to have a problem :-)) Not me, or the hundreds of friends I have :-)) SO delighted you live a sweet life and I have no desire to add to whatever problems you DO have in life :-)) Perhaps someone who DOES still exist off her killfile would convey that message? Kindest regards to those lurkers who support my actions and read the 'good advice' given on this newsgroup. What a pity that they do not wish to contribute to such a 'closed newsgroup' :-(((( Can those who "own the newsgroup" or feel they "own the newsgroup" not see the folly of their ways? Do please have a pleasant evening everyone :-)) I will Life is toooooooooooooooooooo short to be sad :-)) Mike More friends than not by a hundredfold. :-)))) -- The Royal Naval Electrical Branch Association. 'THE' Association if you served in the Electrical Branch of the Royal Navy Reunion Bournemouth August/September 2007 FULL. WAIT LIST OPERATINGwww.rneba.org.ukto find your ex-Greenie mess mateswww.iowtours.comfor all ex-Service Reunions. More being added daily "Navy Days" Portsmouth 25th - 27th July 2008. RN Shipmates will have a Stand- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Mike, please stop, Sacha is here to give good advice, isn't that what this newsgroup is about? Judith |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
:-((Off we go again :-((
On Aug 29, 4:30 pm, La Puce wrote:
On 29 Aug, 00:26, Sacha wrote: I'm the only person you've fallen out with here? Good lord above. I've fallen out with nobody here Sacha. I've had quarells with you and you alone. The rest are discussions. I've met many urglers too - I've even answered to two emails today. Now, ask yourself why they don't post on this forum but contact me via email? You're so deluded, it's painful - but it gives us something to laugh at. Nor true, my dear, you have fallen out with me bigtime. Can't we just ignore those who we don't like for whatever reason? Lets stick to gardening. Sacha has a vast knowledge and I profit from that. Judith |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
:-((Off we go again :-((
On 29/8/07 21:14, in article
, " wrote: On Aug 29, 5:18 pm, Sally Thompson wrote: On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 15:51:43 +0100, Alan Holmes wrote (in article ): "Sacha" wrote in message . uk... On 27/8/07 19:21, in article m, "La Puce" wrote: On 27 Aug, 18:50, Sacha wrote: Not if you're replying to Mike Crowe you haven't. He stirs up trouble on every group he posts to and it's my belief he gets off on it. The posts he has made in this thread he has started are a perfect example. He's in most peoples' kill files so the only way he can get attention is to try to encourage others to fight and argue and for the unwary to respond to him. He's a vile piece of work. snip usual diatribe from Puce Well, I'd rather be friend with the real folks around here and with Mike Crowe anytime. Note that I've never had quarells with anybody but you. This surely is telling. It's very telling, Puce. It's telling us that you wouldn't recognise truth if it bit you. I'm the only person you've fallen out with here? Good lord above. She cannot fall out with me cos I killfiled La Puke a long time ago! Me too! I think it is possible that Puce thinks that because Sacha is one of the few who takes the time and trouble to reply, that everyone else is in agreement with her (Puce, not Sacha). The opposite is far more likely. There are only two people on urg in my killfile (not that I expect anyone else to be interested) and the other one is Mike Crowe. Life is a lot sweeter since I did that. -- Sally in Shropshire, UK Burne-Jones/William Morris window in Shropshire church with conservation churchyard:http://www.whitton-stmarys.org.uk- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hi Sally, how are you? Poor dear Sacha, she will always have a problem with certain people, why? Simply because she has such expert knowledge and what she doesn't know, she will readily ask Ray, and she will also acknowledge that he is the provider of the information. Rock on Sacha - we love you. Judith ;-)) Rock on Tommy! Yes, I'm lucky to have Ray to consult if I'm stymied and yes, I do always tell urg if the info has come from him but via me. It's only fair to do that. -- Sacha http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon (remove weeds from address) 'We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children.' |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
:-((Off we go again :-((
"La Puce" wrote in message
On 29 Aug, 00:26, Sacha wrote: I'm the only person you've fallen out with here? Good lord above. I've fallen out with nobody here Sacha. I've had quarells with you and you alone. Rubbish! You and I have quarrelled regularly as you have also done with some of the experts who no longer bother to post here and they left saying it was because of you and your nasty ways. The rest are discussions. I've met many urglers too - I've even answered to two emails today. Now, ask yourself why they don't post on this forum but contact me via email? No one would believe that. That comment is so overdone and old hat and unbelievable that even cyber kiddies don't bother to use it any more. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
:-((Off we go again :-((
In reply to Sacha ) who wrote this in
, I, Marvo, say : I think you'll find you're not alone in that selection for the kill file. I'm sure you're right that Puce thinks silence means support, not realising it signifies kill files - ditto poor old Crowe. However, if everyone kill files her she can go on giving the garbage information she's just given Judith Lea re planting Oleanders outdoors in hideously low winter temperatures and keeping them wet! http://www.pfaf.org/database/plants.php?Nerium+oleander It says you can plant Oleanders outdoors, down to -5 and -10 for short periods. I've never had one. Anything I say on here is something I've actually done, not something I've read, unless it has one of these after it :-) My fingers are crossed with my Bougainvillea, it's staying outdoors in bubble wrap unless it gets extreme. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
:-((Off we go again :-((
On 30/8/07 09:01, in article , "Uncle Marvo"
wrote: In reply to Sacha ) who wrote this in , I, Marvo, say : I think you'll find you're not alone in that selection for the kill file. I'm sure you're right that Puce thinks silence means support, not realising it signifies kill files - ditto poor old Crowe. However, if everyone kill files her she can go on giving the garbage information she's just given Judith Lea re planting Oleanders outdoors in hideously low winter temperatures and keeping them wet! http://www.pfaf.org/database/plants.php?Nerium+oleander It says you can plant Oleanders outdoors, down to -5 and -10 for short periods. Yes indeed. What the argument developed from was Puce refusing to believe that Judith's village in France gets a LOT colder than that and stays that way for some time. I've never had one. Anything I say on here is something I've actually done, not something I've read, unless it has one of these after it :-) My fingers are crossed with my Bougainvillea, it's staying outdoors in bubble wrap unless it gets extreme. Some people don't trust bubble wrap because it causes condensation and the plants rot. On the whole, horticultural fleece might be safer and you could build a frame covered in plastic to act as a sort of mini greenhouse, perhaps? This might provide some inspiration. ;-) http://gallery.future-i.com/germany/pic:camellia-house/ -- Sacha http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon (remove weeds from address) 'We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children.' |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
:-((Off we go again :-((
In reply to Sacha ) who wrote this in
, I, Marvo, say : On 30/8/07 09:01, in article , "Uncle Marvo" wrote: In reply to Sacha ) who wrote this in , I, Marvo, say : I think you'll find you're not alone in that selection for the kill file. I'm sure you're right that Puce thinks silence means support, not realising it signifies kill files - ditto poor old Crowe. However, if everyone kill files her she can go on giving the garbage information she's just given Judith Lea re planting Oleanders outdoors in hideously low winter temperatures and keeping them wet! http://www.pfaf.org/database/plants.php?Nerium+oleander It says you can plant Oleanders outdoors, down to -5 and -10 for short periods. Yes indeed. What the argument developed from was Puce refusing to believe that Judith's village in France gets a LOT colder than that and stays that way for some time. She has a village in France? Blimey, that *is* posh :-) I've never had one. Anything I say on here is something I've actually done, not something I've read, unless it has one of these after it :-) My fingers are crossed with my Bougainvillea, it's staying outdoors in bubble wrap unless it gets extreme. Some people don't trust bubble wrap because it causes condensation and the plants rot. On the whole, horticultural fleece might be safer and you could build a frame covered in plastic to act as a sort of mini greenhouse, perhaps? I actually have a spare greenhouse frame, one of those metal ones with shelves. If you don't put the shelves in it would hold the Bougainvillea. Good idea. This might provide some inspiration. ;-) http://gallery.future-i.com/germany/pic:camellia-house/ Most excellent. I shall start building now :-) |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
:-((Off we go again :-((
"FarmI" ask@itshall be given wrote in message ... "La Puce" wrote in message On 29 Aug, 00:26, Sacha wrote: I'm the only person you've fallen out with here? Good lord above. snip The rest are discussions. I've met many urglers too - I've even answered to two emails today. Now, ask yourself why they don't post on this forum but contact me via email? No one would believe that. That comment is so overdone and old hat and unbelievable that even cyber kiddies don't bother to use it any more. Just because a comment may be misused and overdone, it doesn't follow that it is always false. A few years back, when I was on the receiving end of the rougher side of Janet's tongue, for having disagreed with her over something (can't remember what), I received several unsolicited e-mails of 'support' from urglers, who chose to keep out of the discussion on the open forum. I didn't mention it at the time, because, frankly, 'flames' don't bother me, and I didn't want to embarrass them, but it's true nonetheless. Hence it is possible IMO that Helene may well have 'supporters' who choose to remain anonymous. It takes all sorts, you know, and the fact you clearly can't stand her doesn't mean everybody else does, too. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
:-((Off we go again :-((
"BAC" wrote in message ... Just because a comment may be misused and overdone, it doesn't follow that it is always false. A few years back, when I was on the receiving end of the rougher side of Janet's tongue, for having disagreed with her over something (can't remember what), I received several unsolicited e-mails of 'support' from urglers, who chose to keep out of the discussion on the open forum. I didn't mention it at the time, because, frankly, 'flames' don't bother me, and I didn't want to embarrass them, but it's true nonetheless. Hence it is possible IMO that Helene may well have 'supporters' who choose to remain anonymous. It takes all sorts, you know, and the fact you clearly can't stand her doesn't mean everybody else does, too. Thank you :-)) Mike -- The Royal Naval Electrical Branch Association. 'THE' Association if you served in the Electrical Branch of the Royal Navy Reunion Bournemouth August/September 2007 FULL. WAIT LIST OPERATING www.rneba.org.uk to find your ex-Greenie mess mates www.iowtours.com for all ex-Service Reunions. More being added daily "Navy Days" Portsmouth 25th - 27th July 2008. RN Shipmates will have a Stand |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Again rain, again! | United Kingdom | |||
Tomatoes (Again) - Capillary Matting? - Again | United Kingdom | |||
Little Black Ants, Again & Again | North Carolina | |||
Bloody VERMIN Cats again, and again, and again, and again....:-(((( | United Kingdom | |||
Steveo Spanked Again - Was: rat does the tard dance...again | Lawns |