Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Chris Nolan's Cavat technique (Monetary value of trees.)
Almost two years ago, here, I wrote a tongue in cheek piece about a
sort of NHS for gardens. http://groups.google.com/group/uk.re...dbe3b eb41741 An article in the RHS The Garden magazine around that time about gardens being lost to cars and built-on urbanisation got me thinking about putting a $ or £ value on gardens, especially as, at the time, our Birch tree was doing it's autumnal thing. Back then, our neighbour of the time was not complaining. (since deceased RIP) However, times have changed and this year we've had 2 complaints concerning it's leaves and flowers blowing into their gardens. back in 2006, part of what I wrote (the *** spells out the really tongue in cheek bit, this time round) was; "Imagine an alternate world were the values of gardens compares with ownership of cars. or bricks'n'mortar properties, i.e. where the commercial value of having a garden competes favourably with the advantages of transforming the garden into a car parking space, or an extension to the main building. Where the value of gardens recognises the essence of variety thereby off-setting the monotony of the type of globalisation as written about in last month's RHS The Garden magazine. ***You could claim garden expenses against your taxes, or the state would carry out the work for you. You could even be paid a sort of over-the-top rent for having and maintaining your own garden, whilst maintaining full autonomy over it. . Wouldn't that be nice (-:*** It would mean being in a world were such garden value has being asserted. In this world, most realise that a garden is worth more than the sum of its parts, but little is known about just what that extra sum amounts to. Well, now it seems there is a system called the Chris Nolan's Cavat Technique (actually, that's old news) whereby a tree's size, health, location (number of people that see it) and historical aspect are taken into account. Trouble is, I can't find any actual information on the formula so that I can do the same for our rather beautiful and fine, supremely healthy, 15-20m high, (60cm diameter at around 1.5m), which has being there a good 30 years and can be viewed by several people... dozens at least (-: |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Chris Nolan's Cavat technique (Monetary value of trees.)
On Oct 18, 9:39*pm, aquachimp
wrote: Almost two years ago, here, *I wrote a tongue in cheek piece about a sort of NHS for gardens.http://groups.google.com/group/uk.re...thread/thread/... An article in the RHS The Garden magazine around that time *about gardens being lost to cars and built-on urbanisation got me thinking about putting a $ or £ value on gardens, especially as, at the time, our Birch tree was doing it's autumnal thing. Back then, our neighbour of the time was not complaining. (since deceased RIP) However, times have changed and this year we've had 2 complaints concerning it's leaves and flowers blowing into their gardens. back in 2006, part of what I wrote (the *** spells out the really tongue in cheek bit, this time round) was; "Imagine an alternate world were the values of gardens compares with ownership of cars. or bricks'n'mortar properties, i.e. where the commercial value of having a garden competes favourably with the advantages of transforming the garden into a car parking space, or an extension to the main building. Where the value of gardens recognises the essence of variety thereby off-setting the monotony of the type of globalisation as written about in last month's *RHS The Garden magazine. ***You could claim garden expenses against your taxes, or the state would carry out the work for you. You could even be paid a sort of over-the-top rent for having and maintaining your own garden, whilst maintaining full autonomy over it. . Wouldn't that be nice (-:*** It would mean being in a world were such garden value has being asserted. In this world, most realise that a garden is worth more than the sum of its parts, but little is known about just what that extra sum amounts to. Well, now it seems there is a system called the *Chris Nolan's Cavat Technique (actually, that's old news) whereby a tree's size, health, location (number of people *that see it) and historical aspect are taken into account. Trouble is, I can't find any actual information on the formula so that I can do the same for our rather beautiful and fine, supremely healthy, 15-20m high, (60cm diameter at around 1.5m), which has being there a good 30 years and can be viewed by several people... dozens at least (-: urm, it's a birch tree. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
proper technique for planting potted trees | Gardening | |||
Monetary value of kiwano vine | Gardening | |||
[IBC] Thanking monetary contributors | Bonsai | |||
For Chris Boulby | United Kingdom | |||
Welcome back Chris Owens! | Gardening |