#1   Report Post  
Old 19-02-2009, 05:20 PM posted to uk.rec.gardening
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,959
Default In time

What will your garden look like in 2,000,000 (2 Million) years time?

(The Earth is reputed to be 36,000,000,000 years old. That is 36 Thousand
Million)

Just think, how important are you really? ........ ;-)

Mike

--
.................................................. ..............


  #2   Report Post  
Old 19-02-2009, 05:45 PM posted to uk.rec.gardening
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Oct 2008
Posts: 492
Default In time

On Feb 19, 5:20*pm, "'Mike'" wrote:
(The Earth is reputed to be 36,000,000,000 years old. That is 36 Thousand
Million)

Just think, how important are you really? ........ ;-)


Well the real point is, Mike, all those years of evolution and
improvement have been leading up to..........me!
  #3   Report Post  
Old 19-02-2009, 05:51 PM posted to uk.rec.gardening
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,959
Default In time



--
.................................................. ..............
"moghouse" wrote in message
...
On Feb 19, 5:20 pm, "'Mike'" wrote:
(The Earth is reputed to be 36,000,000,000 years old. That is 36 Thousand
Million)

Just think, how important are you really? ........ ;-)


Well the real point is, Mike, all those years of evolution and
improvement have been leading up to..........me!

------------------------------

and you think you are important?

Sorry, NO subscribers to this newsgroup are important, no matter what they
think.

Kindest possible regards

Mike


  #4   Report Post  
Old 19-02-2009, 07:23 PM posted to uk.rec.gardening
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,811
Default In time

In message
,
moghouse writes
On Feb 19, 5:20*pm, "'Mike'" wrote:
(The Earth is reputed to be 36,000,000,000 years old. That is 36 Thousand
Million)

Just think, how important are you really? ........ ;-)


Well the real point is, Mike, all those years of evolution and
improvement have been leading up to..........me!


He could at least have got the age right. (The Earth is about 4.5
billion years old; the estimates of the time that have passed since the
Big Bang have converged on 13.7 billion years.)
--
Stewart Robert Hinsley
  #5   Report Post  
Old 19-02-2009, 07:46 PM posted to uk.rec.gardening
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,959
Default In time



--
.................................................. ..............
"Stewart Robert Hinsley" wrote in message
...
In message
,
moghouse writes
On Feb 19, 5:20 pm, "'Mike'" wrote:
(The Earth is reputed to be 36,000,000,000 years old. That is 36
Thousand
Million)

Just think, how important are you really? ........ ;-)


Well the real point is, Mike, all those years of evolution and
improvement have been leading up to..........me!


He could at least have got the age right. (The Earth is about 4.5 billion
years old; the estimates of the time that have passed since the Big Bang
have converged on 13.7 billion years.)
--
Stewart Robert Hinsley


Which goes to show, that no matter which figures you apply, man's presence
on Earth is nothing less than a layer of dust. So I ask again, how important
are you in the minute time we are here?

Not at all, but look how important SOME people think they are :-)))




  #6   Report Post  
Old 19-02-2009, 08:11 PM posted to uk.rec.gardening
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Feb 2009
Posts: 20
Default In time

'Mike' wrote:
  #7   Report Post  
Old 19-02-2009, 08:12 PM posted to uk.rec.gardening
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,869
Default In time


"'Mike'" wrote in message
...


-- .................................................. .............
"Stewart Robert Hinsley" wrote in message
...
In message
,
moghouse writes
On Feb 19, 5:20 pm, "'Mike'" wrote:
(The Earth is reputed to be 36,000,000,000 years old. That is 36
Thousand
Million)

Just think, how important are you really? ........ ;-)

Well the real point is, Mike, all those years of evolution and
improvement have been leading up to..........me!


He could at least have got the age right. (The Earth is about 4.5 billion
years old; the estimates of the time that have passed since the Big Bang
have converged on 13.7 billion years.)
--
Stewart Robert Hinsley


Which goes to show, that no matter which figures you apply, man's presence
on Earth is nothing less than a layer of dust. So I ask again, how
important are you in the minute time we are here?

Not at all, but look how important SOME people think they are :-)))

sigh
I have no idea what my garden will look like even a million years hence.
It's not anything I will have to worry about.
At the moment it's full of snowdrops and the species crocus are rearing
their heads, it's lovely and gives me hope that spring is not far away.



  #8   Report Post  
Old 19-02-2009, 08:22 PM posted to uk.rec.gardening
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,907
Default In time

In article ,
Stewart Robert Hinsley wrote:
In message
,
moghouse writes
On Feb 19, 5:20*pm, "'Mike'" wrote:
(The Earth is reputed to be 36,000,000,000 years old. That is 36 Thousand
Million)

Just think, how important are you really? ........ ;-)


Well the real point is, Mike, all those years of evolution and
improvement have been leading up to..........me!


He could at least have got the age right. (The Earth is about 4.5
billion years old; the estimates of the time that have passed since the
Big Bang have converged on 13.7 billion years.)


Well, given that most current cosmology would be rejected from a
fiction competition on the grounds of insufficient plausibility,
I am disinclined to criticise anyone for choosing an arbitrarily
different figure. I am not inclined to believe him, either, of
course.

Personally, I like Reginald's views on evolution: "in most people
that I know, the process is far from complete." This thread merely
confirms me in by views.


Regards,
Nick Maclaren.
  #9   Report Post  
Old 19-02-2009, 08:39 PM posted to uk.rec.gardening
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Oct 2008
Posts: 492
Default In time

On Feb 19, 7:46*pm, "'Mike'" wrote:
--
.................................................. .............
"Stewart Robert Hinsley" wrote in ...





In message
,
moghouse writes
On Feb 19, 5:20 pm, "'Mike'" wrote:
(The Earth is reputed to be 36,000,000,000 years old. That is 36
Thousand
Million)


Just think, how important are you really? ........ ;-)


Well the real point is, Mike, all those years of evolution and
improvement have been leading up to..........me!


He could at least have got the age right. (The Earth is about 4.5 billion
years old; the estimates of the time that have passed since the Big Bang
have converged on 13.7 billion years.)
--
Stewart Robert Hinsley


Which goes to show, that no matter which figures you apply, man's presence
on Earth is nothing less than a layer of dust. So I ask again, how important
are you in the minute time we are here?

Not at all, but look how important SOME people think they are :-)))- Hide quoted text -


OK, I confess....I haven't had a big bang lately! I'm really sorry you
have such a low opinion of your self - sadly I think you may be right.
  #10   Report Post  
Old 19-02-2009, 09:13 PM posted to uk.rec.gardening
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,869
Default In time


wrote in message
...

Well, given that most current cosmology would be rejected from a
fiction competition on the grounds of insufficient plausibility,
I am disinclined to criticise anyone for choosing an arbitrarily
different figure. I am not inclined to believe him, either, of
course.


This is beautiful. I'm going to send it to my German friend, she thinks she
understands English. Until she saw this ;-)
LOL

Tina




  #11   Report Post  
Old 19-02-2009, 09:29 PM posted to uk.rec.gardening
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,811
Default In time

In message , Christina Websell
writes

wrote in message
...

Well, given that most current cosmology would be rejected from a
fiction competition on the grounds of insufficient plausibility,
I am disinclined to criticise anyone for choosing an arbitrarily
different figure. I am not inclined to believe him, either, of
course.


This is beautiful. I'm going to send it to my German friend, she thinks she
understands English. Until she saw this ;-)
LOL


The way I put the sentiment is that any sufficiently advanced physics is
indistinguishable from nonsense. (Tip of the hat to Sir Arthur.)

--
Stewart Robert Hinsley
  #12   Report Post  
Old 19-02-2009, 09:51 PM posted to uk.rec.gardening
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,907
Default In time

In article ,
Christina Websell wrote:

wrote in message
...

Well, given that most current cosmology would be rejected from a
fiction competition on the grounds of insufficient plausibility,
I am disinclined to criticise anyone for choosing an arbitrarily
different figure. I am not inclined to believe him, either, of
course.


This is beautiful. I'm going to send it to my German friend, she thinks she
understands English. Until she saw this ;-)
LOL


Well, I am a professional pedant :-)


Regards,
Nick Maclaren.
  #13   Report Post  
Old 19-02-2009, 10:04 PM posted to uk.rec.gardening
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Dec 2008
Posts: 20
Default In time

On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:39:52 -0800 (PST), moghouse
wrote:

On Feb 19, 7:46*pm, "'Mike'" wrote:
--
.................................................. .............
"Stewart Robert Hinsley" wrote in ...





In message
,
moghouse writes
On Feb 19, 5:20 pm, "'Mike'" wrote:
(The Earth is reputed to be 36,000,000,000 years old. That is 36
Thousand
Million)


Just think, how important are you really? ........ ;-)


Well the real point is, Mike, all those years of evolution and
improvement have been leading up to..........me!


He could at least have got the age right. (The Earth is about 4.5 billion
years old; the estimates of the time that have passed since the Big Bang
have converged on 13.7 billion years.)
--
Stewart Robert Hinsley


Which goes to show, that no matter which figures you apply, man's presence
on Earth is nothing less than a layer of dust. So I ask again, how important
are you in the minute time we are here?

Not at all, but look how important SOME people think they are :-)))- Hide quoted text -



OK, I confess....I haven't had a big bang lately! I'm really sorry you
have such a low opinion of your self - sadly I think you may be right.



  #14   Report Post  
Old 19-02-2009, 10:07 PM posted to uk.rec.gardening
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,907
Default In time

In article ,
Stewart Robert Hinsley wrote:
In message , Christina Websell
writes


Well, given that most current cosmology would be rejected from a
fiction competition on the grounds of insufficient plausibility,
I am disinclined to criticise anyone for choosing an arbitrarily
different figure. I am not inclined to believe him, either, of
course.


This is beautiful. I'm going to send it to my German friend, she thinks she
understands English. Until she saw this ;-)
LOL


The way I put the sentiment is that any sufficiently advanced physics is
indistinguishable from nonsense. (Tip of the hat to Sir Arthur.)


Yes :-) Actually, that's not the thing that annoys me most about the
cosmologists - it's the way that all their evidence depends on a very
complicated analysis of the data, which can only be done by assuming
their hypothesis! It's tortoises all the way down ....

We have damn-all direct evidence of general relativity at high space-
time stresses, or even that the red shift is due to recession, and
there are alternative hypotheses that are mathematically consistent
and compatible with known physics. Yes, they're probably wrong, but
that doesn't prove the current hypotheses are right.



Regards,
Nick Maclaren.
  #15   Report Post  
Old 19-02-2009, 10:28 PM posted to uk.rec.gardening
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,869
Default In time


"Stewart Robert Hinsley" wrote in message
...
In message , Christina Websell
writes

wrote in message
...

Well, given that most current cosmology would be rejected from a
fiction competition on the grounds of insufficient plausibility,
I am disinclined to criticise anyone for choosing an arbitrarily
different figure. I am not inclined to believe him, either, of
course.


This is beautiful. I'm going to send it to my German friend, she thinks
she
understands English. Until she saw this ;-)
LOL


The way I put the sentiment is that any sufficiently advanced physics is
indistinguishable from nonsense. (Tip of the hat to Sir Arthur.)


Oh, stop it!



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I'm new here, I may be asking for help from time to time unicron85 United Kingdom 21 08-04-2014 11:15 PM
dianna condemns, then Jeff recently comes a resident pavement from time to time Kaye's matrix Ikram Jbilou Dawood Ponds 0 18-11-2007 03:12 PM
there Petra will follow the request, and if Madeleine not sails it too, the suffering will destroy from time to time the deaf cottage Josef P. Madren Ponds 0 14-11-2007 05:36 AM
Zygopetalum mackayi bloom time? Caren Orchids 5 30-01-2003 10:45 PM
Help: Garden Time Lapse on PBS burley lilley Gardening 2 30-01-2003 07:25 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 GardenBanter.co.uk.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Gardening"

 

Copyright © 2017