|
Another one six feet under
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/ne...-29379801.html
****wit was trying to undertake a turning bus, looks like. Their own fault; still, one less cyclist is a win for the rest of us. |
Another one six feet under
On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:31:19 +0100, Judith in England
wrote: http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/ne...thern-ireland/ cyclist-dies-after-bus-collision-29379801.html ****wit was trying to undertake a turning bus, looks like. Their own fault; still, one less cyclist is a win for the rest of us. Hullo "Judith". (Or perhaps I should call you "Guy"?) Any particular reason you chose that name? |
Another one six feet under
Jilly wrote in news:almarsoft.5539978604248585883
@nntp.aioe.org: On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:31:19 +0100, Judith in England wrote: http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/ne...thern-ireland/ cyclist-dies-after-bus-collision-29379801.html ****wit was trying to undertake a turning bus, looks like. Their own fault; still, one less cyclist is a win for the rest of us. Hullo "Judith". (Or perhaps I should call you "Guy"?) Any particular reason you chose that name? Just another f*wit having a go at us. It will pass. Baz |
Another one six feet under
On 28/06/2013 14:31, Judith in England wrote:
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/ne...-29379801.html ****wit was trying to undertake a turning bus, looks like. Their own fault; still, one less cyclist is a win for the rest of us. All I can say id "You're sick" |
Another one six feet under
On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 21:24:03 +0100, David Hill
wrote: On 28/06/2013 14:31, Judith in England wrote: http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/ne...-29379801.html ****wit was trying to undertake a turning bus, looks like. Their own fault; still, one less cyclist is a win for the rest of us. All I can say id "You're sick" I agree - someone is trying to impersonate me - and failing - they are quite sick It is poor old "Jilly" - she *is* quite sick. Note she did not actually use my true email address. I really must have got right up her nose. |
Another one six feet under
On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:31:19 +0100, Judith in England wrote:
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/ne...-29379801.html ****wit was trying to undertake a turning bus, looks like. Their own fault; still, one less cyclist is a win for the rest of us. Oh dear, oh dear: someone is really quite keen in discrediting me. Clue: I do not post as "Judith in England " - but the poster wants people to believe I do. (S)he has even checked what groups I post to. It is quite sad really. Still - I will take the opportunity: my courgettes are doing really well!! |
Another one six feet under
On 28/06/13 15:13, Baz wrote:
Jilly wrote in news:almarsoft.5539978604248585883 @nntp.aioe.org: On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:31:19 +0100, Judith in England wrote: http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/ne...thern-ireland/ cyclist-dies-after-bus-collision-29379801.html ****wit was trying to undertake a turning bus, looks like. Their own fault; still, one less cyclist is a win for the rest of us. Hullo "Judith". (Or perhaps I should call you "Guy"?) Any particular reason you chose that name? Just another f*wit having a go at us. It will pass. After it's negotiated the rectum. -- Rusty Hinge |
Another one six feet under
Judith wrote in
: On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:31:19 +0100, Judith in England wrote: http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/ne...thern-ireland/ cyclist-dies-after-bus-collision-29379801.html ****wit was trying to undertake a turning bus, looks like. Their own fault; still, one less cyclist is a win for the rest of us. Oh dear, oh dear: someone is really quite keen in discrediting me. Clue: I do not post as "Judith in England " - but the poster wants people to believe I do. (S)he has even checked what groups I post to. It is quite sad really. I have been victim to this before. Very unpleasant. Baz |
Another one six feet under
On 29/06/2013 11:04, Baz wrote:
Judith wrote in : On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:31:19 +0100, Judith in England wrote: http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/ne...thern-ireland/ cyclist-dies-after-bus-collision-29379801.html ****wit was trying to undertake a turning bus, looks like. Their own fault; still, one less cyclist is a win for the rest of us. Oh dear, oh dear: someone is really quite keen in discrediting me. Clue: I do not post as "Judith in England " - but the poster wants people to believe I do. (S)he has even checked what groups I post to. It is quite sad really. I have been victim to this before. Very unpleasant. Baz Indeed, but if you are going to stalk people on the internet and impersonate others, you can't really complain when someone else does it to you. |
Another one six feet under
On 2013-06-28 22:02:05 +0100, Judith said:
On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:31:19 +0100, Judith in England wrote: http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/ne...-29379801.html ****wit was trying to undertake a turning bus, looks like. Their own fault; still, one less cyclist is a win for the rest of us. Oh dear, oh dear: someone is really quite keen in discrediting me. Clue: I do not post as "Judith in England " - but the poster wants people to believe I do. (S)he has even checked what groups I post to. It is quite sad really. Still - I will take the opportunity: my courgettes are doing really well!! Could I suggest you don't cross post please? -- Sacha www.hillhousenursery.com South Devon www.helpforheroes.org.uk |
Another one six feet under
Simon Weissel wrote in
: I have been victim to this before. Very unpleasant. Baz Indeed, but if you are going to stalk people on the internet and impersonate others, you can't really complain when someone else does it to you. You are a bit of a shit, aren't you. Nothing would please me better if you carried on with this. Baz |
Another one six feet under
Sacha wrote in
: On 2013-06-28 22:02:05 +0100, Judith said: On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:31:19 +0100, Judith in England wrote: http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/ne...orthern-irelan d/cyclist-dies-after-bus-collision-29379801.html ****wit was trying to undertake a turning bus, looks like. Their own fault; still, one less cyclist is a win for the rest of us. Oh dear, oh dear: someone is really quite keen in discrediting me. Clue: I do not post as "Judith in England " - but the poster wants people to believe I do. (S)he has even checked what groups I post to. It is quite sad really. Still - I will take the opportunity: my courgettes are doing really well!! Could I suggest you don't cross post please? Sacha, he/she/it is trying to rattle our cage. Baz |
Another one six feet under
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 11:58:15 +0100, Sacha wrote:
On 2013-06-28 22:02:05 +0100, Judith said: On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:31:19 +0100, Judith in England wrote: http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/ne...-29379801.html ****wit was trying to undertake a turning bus, looks like. Their own fault; still, one less cyclist is a win for the rest of us. Oh dear, oh dear: someone is really quite keen in discrediting me. Clue: I do not post as "Judith in England " - but the poster wants people to believe I do. (S)he has even checked what groups I post to. It is quite sad really. Still - I will take the opportunity: my courgettes are doing really well!! Could I suggest you don't cross post please? Confused. I now see another post from "Judith in England" (Poorly Beetroot) with a purported address of . -- Cheers, Jake ======================================= URGling from the other end of Swansea Bay where it's unusually just like Dave's end, only better :) |
Another one six feet under
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 17:56:56 +0100, Jake
wrote: Confused. I now see another post from "Judith in England" (Poorly Beetroot) with a purported address of . Soz, clicked send too quickly. The address I quoted does appear to be Judith's email address whereas the " one is used by Chris Hogg. I haven't seen any cross-postings (referred to by Sacha) but that may be down to my Agent settings. Then I have some input from Baz responding to some Simon chap who I've never heard of or seen any post from. Shall I just crawl into a hole or am I missing something? -- Cheers, Jake ======================================= URGling from the other end of Swansea Bay where it's unusually just like Dave's end, only better :) |
Another one six feet under
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 11:47:17 +0100, Simon Weissel
wrote: On 29/06/2013 11:04, Baz wrote: Judith wrote in : On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:31:19 +0100, Judith in England wrote: http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/ne...thern-ireland/ cyclist-dies-after-bus-collision-29379801.html ****wit was trying to undertake a turning bus, looks like. Their own fault; still, one less cyclist is a win for the rest of us. Oh dear, oh dear: someone is really quite keen in discrediting me. Clue: I do not post as "Judith in England " - but the poster wants people to believe I do. (S)he has even checked what groups I post to. It is quite sad really. I have been victim to this before. Very unpleasant. Baz Indeed, but if you are going to stalk people on the internet and impersonate others, you can't really complain when someone else does it to you. Feel free to list the "stalking" activities you think I have carried out. Oh, and please also provide the proof. |
Another one six feet under
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 11:58:15 +0100, Sacha wrote:
On 2013-06-28 22:02:05 +0100, Judith said: snip Still - I will take the opportunity: my courgettes are doing really well!! Could I suggest you don't cross post please? I was replying to a message which happened to be cross-posted - therefore my response needed to be cross-posted. |
Another one six feet under
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 17:56:56 +0100, Jake wrote:
snip Confused. I now see another post from "Judith in England" (Poorly Beetroot) with a purported address of . Someone posted a message from "Judith in England" which was not from me. |
Another one six feet under
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 18:09:27 +0100, Jake
wrote: Confused. I now see another post from "Judith in England" (Poorly Beetroot) with a purported address of . Soz, clicked send too quickly. The address I quoted does appear to be Judith's email address whereas the " one is used by Chris Hogg. Nowt to do with me, I'm afraid. Though a gurgle-gropes search on the address reveals a lot of rather unlady-like posting... |
Another one six feet under
On 29/06/13 18:09, Jake wrote:
Shall I just crawl into a hole or am I missing something? You're not missing anything edifying. -- Rusty Hinge |
Another one six feet under
On 29/06/13 18:52, Judith in England wrote:
I was replying to a message which happened to be cross-posted - therefore my response needed to be cross-posted. That's as logical as saying 'he put his head in the fire, so I needed to as well'. You don't *need* to crosspost. Crossposting does have its uses,but I see no creditable reason to crosspost between URG and URC -- Rusty Hinge |
Another one six feet under
On 2013-06-29 18:52:37 +0100, Judith in England said:
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 11:58:15 +0100, Sacha wrote: On 2013-06-28 22:02:05 +0100, Judith said: snip Still - I will take the opportunity: my courgettes are doing really well!! Could I suggest you don't cross post please? I was replying to a message which happened to be cross-posted - therefore my response needed to be cross-posted. Not really. It could be answered in the group in which the problem originated. -- Sacha www.hillhousenursery.com South Devon www.helpforheroes.org.uk |
Another one six feet under
On 2013-06-30 10:23:12 +0100, Chris Hogg said:
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 16:58:45 -0300, Chris Hogg wrote: On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 18:09:27 +0100, Jake wrote: Confused. I now see another post from "Judith in England" (Poorly Beetroot) with a purported address of . Soz, clicked send too quickly. The address I quoted does appear to be Judith's email address whereas the " one is used by Chris Hogg. Nowt to do with me, I'm afraid. Though a gurgle-gropes search on the address reveals a lot of rather unlady-like posting... Nor is this reply anything to do with me, the Chris Hogg who regularly posts here. Seems like a lot of people here have had their identities copied! My doppelganger is using Groundhog, which I don't use. You're right but if England Judith would stop cross-posting her replies, this rubbish might stop appearing here. Heaven knows newsgroups are plagued with idiots but why encourage them by giving them a wider audience? The likelihood is that several people will just get plonked. -- Sacha www.hillhousenursery.com South Devon www.helpforheroes.org.uk |
Another one six feet under
On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 10:38:10 +0100, Sacha wrote:
snip You're right but if England Judith would stop cross-posting her replies, this rubbish might stop appearing here. Heaven knows newsgroups are plagued with idiots but why encourage them by giving them a wider audience? The likelihood is that several people will just get plonked. To be polite : get lost. This is not *your* news group it is open to the public with an interest in gardening like me. If you do not want people to cross-post, I suggest that you modify the charter to say that it is not allowed. You would realise, if you had the ability, that most of the posts which you incorrectly attribute to me, were not made by me at all. When someone makes a post which is crossposted to other groups, and others reply, then the default is, that the answers will also go to the crossposted groups: just like Baz's, David Hill's, and Janet's replies have done (and I am not criticising them at all - but perhaps in order to be consistent you may wish to do so). I have made just two such posts. If you can find a post (other than a reply) which I have made and cross-posted, then I will be pleased to apologise. If you can't find such a single post, then perhaps you would like to do so. PS From News.Individual.NET policy statement : The e-mail addresses given in "From:", "Reply-To:", and "Sender:" should be valid (= should not bounce because of invalidity). I wonder, is the address valid? I hope no-one complains to them. |
Another one six feet under
Well that said it as it should be said!!!!!
BUT. Who said it?? Not me. Mike On the South East Coast of the Isle of Wight (You will all note that I top posted to save you all scrolling down a load of dross, which according to the charter should have been snipped) "Judith in England" wrote in message ... On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 10:38:10 +0100, Sacha wrote: snip You're right but if England Judith would stop cross-posting her replies, this rubbish might stop appearing here. Heaven knows newsgroups are plagued with idiots but why encourage them by giving them a wider audience? The likelihood is that several people will just get plonked. To be polite : get lost. This is not *your* news group it is open to the public with an interest in gardening like me. If you do not want people to cross-post, I suggest that you modify the charter to say that it is not allowed. You would realise, if you had the ability, that most of the posts which you incorrectly attribute to me, were not made by me at all. When someone makes a post which is crossposted to other groups, and others reply, then the default is, that the answers will also go to the crossposted groups: just like Baz's, David Hill's, and Janet's replies have done (and I am not criticising them at all - but perhaps in order to be consistent you may wish to do so). I have made just two such posts. If you can find a post (other than a reply) which I have made and cross-posted, then I will be pleased to apologise. If you can't find such a single post, then perhaps you would like to do so. PS From News.Individual.NET policy statement : The e-mail addresses given in "From:", "Reply-To:", and "Sender:" should be valid (= should not bounce because of invalidity). I wonder, is the address valid? I hope no-one complains to them. |
Another one six feet under
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 23:12:30 +0100, RustyHinge
wrote: On 29/06/13 18:52, Judith in England wrote: I was replying to a message which happened to be cross-posted - therefore my response needed to be cross-posted. That's as logical as saying 'he put his head in the fire, so I needed to as well'. You don't *need* to crosspost. Crossposting does have its uses,but I see no creditable reason to crosspost between URG and URC Rubbish - the original post and claim was made in both groups - it was therefore sensible to reply in both groups. If you want to moan - then moan at the person who made the first cross-post. Why not get together with Sacha and change the charter? |
Another one six feet under
On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 10:07:22 +0100, Sacha wrote:
On 2013-06-29 18:52:37 +0100, Judith in England said: On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 11:58:15 +0100, Sacha wrote: On 2013-06-28 22:02:05 +0100, Judith said: snip Still - I will take the opportunity: my courgettes are doing really well!! Could I suggest you don't cross post please? I was replying to a message which happened to be cross-posted - therefore my response needed to be cross-posted. Not really. It could be answered in the group in which the problem originated. Rubbish - the reply was intended to be read in both groups as it was a reply to the original post. People who had read the original post, could then read my response irrespective of the group they were reading. Why not get together with Rusty Hinge and get the charter changed to prohibit cross-posting; then you will really be able to moan at people. |
Another one six feet under
Yes change the charter about pruning back previous postings to make them
easier to read, because those who should know better ignore the suggestion don't they? Mike (Sorry I don't have a business I can advertise in my signature) "Judith" wrote in message ... On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 23:12:30 +0100, RustyHinge wrote: On 29/06/13 18:52, Judith in England wrote: I was replying to a message which happened to be cross-posted - therefore my response needed to be cross-posted. That's as logical as saying 'he put his head in the fire, so I needed to as well'. You don't *need* to crosspost. Crossposting does have its uses,but I see no creditable reason to crosspost between URG and URC Rubbish - the original post and claim was made in both groups - it was therefore sensible to reply in both groups. If you want to moan - then moan at the person who made the first cross-post. Why not get together with Sacha and change the charter? |
Another one six feet under
On 30/06/13 19:10, Judith wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 23:12:30 +0100, RustyHinge wrote: On 29/06/13 18:52, Judith in England wrote: I was replying to a message which happened to be cross-posted - therefore my response needed to be cross-posted. That's as logical as saying 'he put his head in the fire, so I needed to as well'. You don't *need* to crosspost. Crossposting does have its uses,but I see no creditable reason to crosspost between URG and URC Rubbish - the original post and claim was made in both groups - it was therefore sensible to reply in both groups. If you want to moan - then moan at the person who made the first cross-post. Why not get together with Sacha and change the charter? I wonder what weed would sprout if we buried the so-called 'Judith' six feet under? -- Rusty Hinge To err is human. To really foul things up requires a computer and the BOFH. |
Another one six feet under
On 2013-11-15 23:54:18 +0000, RustyHinge said:
On 30/06/13 19:10, Judith wrote: On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 23:12:30 +0100, RustyHinge wrote: On 29/06/13 18:52, Judith in England wrote: I was replying to a message which happened to be cross-posted - therefore my response needed to be cross-posted. That's as logical as saying 'he put his head in the fire, so I needed to as well'. You don't *need* to crosspost. Crossposting does have its uses,but I see no creditable reason to crosspost between URG and URC Rubbish - the original post and claim was made in both groups - it was therefore sensible to reply in both groups. If you want to moan - then moan at the person who made the first cross-post. Why not get together with Sacha and change the charter? I wonder what weed would sprout if we buried the so-called 'Judith' six feet under? You're replying to a post sent in late June, Rusty. For myself, I hope the problem has taken care of itself. ;-) -- Sacha www.hillhousenursery.com South Devon |
Another one six feet under
On 16/11/13 18:25, sacha wrote:
On 2013-11-15 23:54:18 +0000, RustyHinge said: On 30/06/13 19:10, Judith wrote: On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 23:12:30 +0100, RustyHinge wrote: On 29/06/13 18:52, Judith in England wrote: I was replying to a message which happened to be cross-posted - therefore my response needed to be cross-posted. That's as logical as saying 'he put his head in the fire, so I needed to as well'. You don't *need* to crosspost. Crossposting does have its uses,but I see no creditable reason to crosspost between URG and URC Rubbish - the original post and claim was made in both groups - it was therefore sensible to reply in both groups. If you want to moan - then moan at the person who made the first cross-post. Why not get together with Sacha and change the charter? I wonder what weed would sprout if we buried the so-called 'Judith' six feet under? You're replying to a post sent in late June, Rusty. For myself, I hope the problem has taken care of itself. ;-) Well, some posts in the thread has miraculously appeared in the undead section at the bottom of the list. And, er, because it was there. -- Rusty Hinge To err is human. To really foul things up requires a computer and the BOFH. |
Another one six feet under
RustyHinge wrote:
Well, some posts in the thread has miraculously appeared in the undead section at the bottom of the list. This sometimes happens because of a server fart. And, er, because it was there. Thank you sir Edmund! In the U.S., crosspost trimming (always a good idea if some of the groups are unconnected with the others) is sometimes called "DeBoursification," after a kook of that name. Who has been silent for some years due to being dead for tax reasons. -- Gary Woods AKA K2AHC- PGP key on request, or at home.earthlink.net/~garygarlic Zone 5/4 in upstate New York, 1420' elevation. NY WO G |
Another one six feet under
|
Another one six feet under
On 16/11/13 20:58, Chris Hogg wrote:
Curious that it should re-emerge here now, as a 'Judith' in uk.d-i-y is currently distancing herself from another 'Judith' who is apparently using her ID in that group. I think thr real Judith has a stalker. -- Rusty Hinge To err is human. To really foul things up requires a computer and the BOFH. |
Another one six feet under
On 16/11/13 22:12, Janet wrote:
In article , says... Well, some posts in the thread has miraculously appeared in the undead section at the bottom of the list. But they are all dated. You requoted Of course. It's only polite. -- Rusty Hinge To err is human. To really foul things up requires a computer and the BOFH. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:52 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter