Franz Heymann wrote:


"Jim W" wrote in message
news:1g021ff.1iv97ht1czt443N%00senetnospamtodayta@ macunlimited.net...
Looks like a labiataea or Mint family...

What are you talking about? I see neither headers nor context.

[snip]

Franz

Franz..

the headers are unecessary as it was just an encoded file.
The context you can get from the Subject. alone
Unidentifiable wild plant - Help - plant.jpg (1/1)

Plant.jp means its a JPEG file format.
(1/1) means its part 1 of 1 part (you can have multipart files eg 1/5,
2/5 etc... these are seen frequently in binary groups. Which as you
pointed out URG is not;-)

I edited the binary completly to save requoting the 3102 lines of that
first post!-)

Your newsreader, OE, may display the OP and its headers differently from
mine.
//
Jim

On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 21:13:07 +0100,
(Jim W) wrote:

I edited the binary completly to save requoting the 3102 lines of that
first post!-)

Your newsreader, OE, may display the OP and its headers differently from
mine.
//
Jim

Your attachment didn't even arrive here.
--
Martin

martin wrote:


On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 21:13:07 +0100,
(Jim W) wrote:

I edited the binary completly to save requoting the 3102 lines of that
first post!-)

Your newsreader, OE, may display the OP and its headers differently from
mine.
//
Jim

Your attachment didn't even arrive here.
--
Martin

Its not 'my attachment' its the original posters..

It arrived fine for me. It was a base 64 encoded Jpg.
Although reading other bits of the thread it appears that some may not
have seen it.
The fact that it shouldn't ahve bee in URG is another matter.

Poss you're ISP strips binaries though. Oh and its not in google either,
I checked!-) Impressed that Kay got a similar guess to mine from the
description alone tho;-) Nice one Kay

I'm going to kill this thread now. It tires me;-)
//
Jim

In article 1g027s3.ibw10d10kqlqqN%00senetnospamtodayta@macun limited.net
, Jim W writes


the headers are unecessary as it was just an encoded file.
The context you can get from the Subject. alone
Unidentifiable wild plant - Help - plant.jpg (1/1)

Plant.jp means its a JPEG file format.
(1/1) means its part 1 of 1 part (you can have multipart files eg 1/5,
2/5 etc... these are seen frequently in binary groups. Which as you
pointed out URG is not;-)

I edited the binary completly to save requoting the 3102 lines of that
first post!-)

Your newsreader, OE, may display the OP and its headers differently from
mine.

It's not the newsreader, it's the ISP.

Demon strips off the jpegs completely, so that they are not posted to
any non-binary ng. It would appear Franz's ISP does the same.

--
Kay Easton

Edward's earthworm page:
http://www.scarboro.demon.co.uk/edward/index.htm

On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 21:34:36 +0100, Kay Easton
wrote:

It's not the newsreader, it's the ISP.

Demon strips off the jpegs completely, so that they are not posted to
any non-binary ng. It would appear Franz's ISP does the same.

and mine or the one that fed mine.. Did anybody see the attachment?
--
Martin

On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 22:40:18 +0200, martin wrote:

On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 21:34:36 +0100, Kay Easton
wrote:

It's not the newsreader, it's the ISP.

Demon strips off the jpegs completely, so that they are not posted to
any non-binary ng. It would appear Franz's ISP does the same.

and mine or the one that fed mine.. Did anybody see the attachment?

Turned up on my server ( claranet ) as a separate post ( the text post
was part 0/1, the binary part 1/1 ). I read the text part.

I'm disappointed that, so far, no-one's 'quoted' the binary and added
"Don't post binaries here"

Regards,



--
Stephen Howard - Woodwind repairs & period restorations
http://www.shwoodwind.co.uk
Emails to: showard{who is at}shwoodwind{dot}co{dot}uk

"Kay Easton" wrote in message
...
In article 1g027s3.ibw10d10kqlqqN%00senetnospamtodayta@macun limited.net
, Jim W writes


the headers are unecessary as it was just an encoded file.
The context you can get from the Subject. alone
Unidentifiable wild plant - Help - plant.jpg (1/1)

Plant.jp means its a JPEG file format.
(1/1) means its part 1 of 1 part (you can have multipart files eg 1/5,
2/5 etc... these are seen frequently in binary groups. Which as you
pointed out URG is not;-)

I edited the binary completly to save requoting the 3102 lines of that
first post!-)

Your newsreader, OE, may display the OP and its headers differently from
mine.

It's not the newsreader, it's the ISP.

Demon strips off the jpegs completely, so that they are not posted to
any non-binary ng. It would appear Franz's ISP does the same.

For which I am truly thankful, as my understanding is that unsolicited
attachments are the favourite mode of travel of virii and the like.

Franz

In article , martin
writes
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 21:34:36 +0100, Kay Easton
wrote:

It's not the newsreader, it's the ISP.

Demon strips off the jpegs completely, so that they are not posted to
any non-binary ng. It would appear Franz's ISP does the same.

and mine or the one that fed mine.. Did anybody see the attachment?

Jim did! ;-)
--
Kay Easton

Edward's earthworm page:
http://www.scarboro.demon.co.uk/edward/index.htm

I saw the attachment; it shows, I reckon, a Lamium, a Red DeadNettle.
These things grow like wildfire in my garden, good as a groundcover
but difficult to rein in.

Andy

"Franz Heymann" wrote in message
...

"aa ka" wrote in message
...

Refrain from sending attachments here. This is a text-only newsgroup.

Franz

martin wrote:


On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 21:13:07 +0100,
(Jim W) wrote:

I edited the binary completly to save requoting the 3102 lines of that
first post!-)

Your newsreader, OE, may display the OP and its headers differently from
mine.
//
Jim

Your attachment didn't even arrive here.
--
Martin

Its not 'my attachment' its the original posters..

It arrived fine for me. It was a base 64 encoded Jpg.
Although reading other bits of the thread it appears that some may not
have seen it.
The fact that it shouldn't ahve bee in URG is another matter.

Poss you're ISP strips binaries though. Oh and its not in google either,
I checked!-) Impressed that Kay got a similar guess to mine from the
description alone tho;-) Nice one Kay

I'm going to kill this thread now. It tires me;-)
//
Jim

"martin" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 21:13:07 +0100,
(Jim W) wrote:

I edited the binary completly to save requoting the 3102 lines of
that
first post!-)

Your newsreader, OE, may display the OP and its headers differently
from
mine.
//
Jim

Your attachment didn't even arrive here.
--
Martin

Martin,

I've found that Wanadoo are excellent at filtering the newsgroups. I
never see any of the dubious posts or any attachments. When I had AOL
as a second account, it was amazing just much rubbish was shown.

Iris McCanna

In article 1g02cdo.1aydkn61tkiyq8N%00senetnospamtodayta@macu nlimited.ne
t, Jim W writes

Impressed that Kay got a similar guess to mine from the
description alone tho;-) Nice one Kay

Thanks :-)

But that's a result of the classification system, and that the OP gave
the main characteristics of the family - the square stems and the 4
nutlets is pretty characteristic of the labiates. The pink flowers and
the 'spininess' narrows it down further - not a mint or thyme for
example.
--
Kay Easton

Edward's earthworm page:
http://www.scarboro.demon.co.uk/edward/index.htm

Kay Easton wrote:

In article 1g02cdo.1aydkn61tkiyq8N%00senetnospamtodayta@macu nlimited.ne
t, Jim W writes

Impressed that Kay got a similar guess to mine from the
description alone tho;-) Nice one Kay

Thanks :-)

But that's a result of the classification system, and that the OP gave
the main characteristics of the family - the square stems and the 4
nutlets is pretty characteristic of the labiates. The pink flowers and
the 'spininess' narrows it down further - not a mint or thyme for
example.

Yep it is a classic desccrip I agree!-)
//
Jim

The message
from "Franz Heymann" contains these words:

What are you talking about? I see neither headers nor context.

His ISP obviously doesn't strip out binaries.

--
Rusty http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hi-fi/tqt.htm
horrid·squeak snailything zetnet·co·uk exchange d.p. with p to
reply.

The message
from martin contains these words:

On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 21:34:36 +0100, Kay Easton
wrote:

It's not the newsreader, it's the ISP.

Demon strips off the jpegs completely, so that they are not posted to
any non-binary ng. It would appear Franz's ISP does the same.

and mine or the one that fed mine.. Did anybody see the attachment?

No, same reason

Janet