GardenBanter.co.uk - Big Bertha Thing blogs

GardenBanter.co.uk (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/)

- United Kingdom (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/united-kingdom/)

- - Big Bertha Thing blogs (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/united-kingdom/9072-re-big-bertha-thing-blogs.html)

Big Bertha Thing blogs

"Chris Hogg" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 23:56:01 +0000, Tony Lance
wrote:

Big Bertha Thing Faculty
remaining stuff snipped

This subject occurs regularly. At the risk of exposing my complete
ignorance and risking an avalanche of replies, what the heck is this
all about, and what relevance does it have to URG?

Perhaps I shouldn't ask!

And another thing. Why are weblogs called blogs? after all, websites aren't
called bsites, webcams aren't called bcams etc etc.

Big Bertha Thing blogs

On Sun, 21 Mar 2004 16:38:36 +0100, "JennyC" wrote:

Good question, but in the cosmic sense maybe it has a link to how things grow ?

Perhaps I shouldn't ask!
Chris

Go on, make yourself even more confused.........:~)
http://www.geocities.com/tonylance/
http://www.crank.net/usenet.html
http://harris.roe.ac.uk/~djef/BOOKMARKS/

Jenny :~)

BTDT. I knew I shouldn't have asked!

--
Chris

E-mail: christopher[dot]hogg[at]virgin[dot]net

Big Bertha Thing blogs

On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 18:28:06 +0000, Chris Hogg wrote:

On Sun, 21 Mar 2004 16:38:36 +0100, "JennyC" wrote:

Good question, but in the cosmic sense maybe it has a link to how things grow ?

Perhaps I shouldn't ask!
Chris

Go on, make yourself even more confused.........:~)
http://www.geocities.com/tonylance/
http://www.crank.net/usenet.html
http://harris.roe.ac.uk/~djef/BOOKMARKS/

Jenny :~)

BTDT. I knew I shouldn't have asked!

Hallelujah!
http://www.dancedanceresurrection.i12.com/

Big Bertha Thing blogs

Big Bertha Thing Faculty
(Sequel to battle)
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/faculty.html
Access page 600K ZIP file
Astrophysics net ring Access site
Newsgroup Reviews including sci.med

301 files from the second battle of cyberspace.

Students Research Faculty

1. Existence
2. Zero interference
3. Foundation (Students, tutors or funding)
4. Articles (See Armistice terms)
5. Publications (See overview)
6. Projects (Pastures, Moisture, Big Bertha, Strategic Studies)
7. Staff (First Aid Tent, volunteers, moderators)
8. Access (All user or staff only.)
9. SRF Classical Astronomy (see OUSA Research, All user)
10. SRF Net Access Policy (See OUSA Research, All user)
11. SRF Los Alamos (see Armistice terms, OUSA Research, restricted access.)
12. SRF Big Bertha (See SRF Los Alamos, staff only.)
13. SRF Strategic Studies (See SRF Big Bertha, staff only.)
14. SRF Specification (See SRF Big Bertha, staff only.)
15. SRF Mathematics (See SRF Big Bertha, staff only.)
16. SRF Prototype (See SRF Big Bertha, staff only.)
17. SRF Yesterslaggings (SRF Net Access Policy, all user)
18. OUSA Classical Particle (OUSA Research, All user)

Big Bertha Thing galios

Nobody understood a thing he said, when he was alive.
After he was dead, they decided that he had done a good job.
The Galios Theory branch of mathematics bears his name.
Now they are trying to teach me, what he did in the first place.
Do you think that the penny will drop, before it becomes posthumous?

Tony Lance

Big Bertha Thing Probe-B

In the Sunday Telegraph of 11th April 2004, the QED section, gave the story of
the Gravity Probe-B satellite launch. This is expected to prove the existence of
a new force of nature, proposed by Einstein.

There are one or two problems with this:-
1. Einstein never proposed this new force of nature. (Funding canard)
2. It is a magnetic force directly proportional to angular momentum. (Memomagnetism)
3. It is weak at Newtonian speeds and strong at near light speeds.
4. The big three in gyroscopes are Einstein, Professor Francis Everitt of
Stanford University and Harold Crabtree M.A.
5. One wrote the definitive book on the subject and the other two read it.
6. The relevant extract from the book is given below. (Spider published 4th March 1998)
7. They do not credit the costermonger, with the definitive experiment,
which proves the existence of the new force of nature.
8. They do not accept that the novelty item was a valid experiment.
9. They believe that the spider wheel was magnetized.
10. The costermonger did not magnetize the spider wheel, he exploited a force of nature.
11. The costermonger discovered, applied and sold the first working application.
12. There is an eye-witness account from 1850 by the author, which kindled his
life-long interest.
13. The description was published in 1909, in the same book.
14. The force of nature has been missing for 150 years, since its discovery.
15. The first modern publication on the subject is spider, on 4th March 1998. (Usenet)
16. Attribution and due credit are two of the failings of modern science.

Big Bertha Thing spider
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/spider.html
Access page JPG 11K Image
Astrophysics net ring Access site
Newsgroup Reviews including uk.rec.cycling

Drawing of a clockwork spider wheel and hairpin.

Extract from Introductory Chapter;-
The "Spider tops," which are frequently sold in the streets of London,
consist of a heavy little disc mounted on a spindle (Fig. XIV.).
When the disc has been set spinning a small curved piece of
metal is placed to touch the toe, and at once begins to slide round it,
first the side (a) in the figure, and then the side (b),
the motion continuing backwards and forwards till the top comes to rest.
The fact is that the toe is magnetic, and this being the case it is easy
to see that the rolling of the toe on the side of the metal produces
the motion.

From the book
An Elementary Treatment of the Theory of
Spinning Tops and Gyroscopic Motion.
By Harold Crabtree M.A.
Formerly Scholar of Pembroke College, Cambridge
Assistant Master at Charterhouse
Longmans, Green and Co. 1923
First Edition 1909
Second Edition 1914
New Impression 1923
(C) Copyright Tony Lance 1998
Distribute complete and free of charge to comply.

Big Bertha Thing fact

Anything but a fact, changes the face of twentieth century science.
1. No iron moons and planetary cores.
2. No red shift measure of speed.
3. No Patrick Moore star at 95% the speed of light.
4. Muons arrive on earth.
5. Relativity is like an imaginary number; useful but not real.
6. Einstein-Haas gives a field strength 1/10000th the electric field.
7. Wave particle duality is a field effect.
8. Schroedinger is an approximation.

Who has the wit to check the fact?

Tony Lance

Big Bertha Thing blogs