GardenBanter.co.uk - View Single Post

David Hill · 26-04-2014, 10:20 AM posted to uk.rec.gardening

On 26/04/2014 10:15, Martin wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2014 09:55:50 +0100, "philgurr"
wrote:

wrote in message ...
On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 22:57:33 +0100, sacha wrote:

On 2014-04-25 15:03:56 +0000, said:

On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 23:54:16 +0100, "Let It Be"
wrote:

David Hill wrote:
On R.4 this morning they were talking about the trouble they are
having in the US of A obtaining drugs to use when they carry out the
death penalty, and they were talking to an advocate for one person
awaiting the death sentence.
He said that they have given up trying to get the sentence repealed,
but he is worried that "some of the drug combinations they might use
could be harmful" I thought that was the purpose of them.
David

Ah, but the condemned might die in agony if the are given the wrong drugs -
and that will never do will it?

One of the drugs is an anaesthetic so there is no pain. It's still a
barbaric practice regardless of the crime.

And murder isn't?

It is the execution by proxy that is barbaric.

You think it should be done by the victim?

Posthumously?

We read so often about drug users being found dead because the drug they
used is to pure and so to strong.
Why cant they use pure heroin or something then the condemned could die
happy?