Nick Maclaren wrote:
In article ,
Sacha wrote:
On 2014-04-29 06:58:46 +0000, Chris Hogg said:
On 28 Apr 2014 21:36:15 GMT, Emery Davis
wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 18:42:24 +0200, kay wrote:

I can identify both your trees, but I find the quote in your tagline
offensive, and I would rather not help you.

+1

+2

+3.

The trouble with Lord Longford is that he was indistinguishable
from a satire of himself, so it is impossible to tell whether
that signature was intended as a statement of bigotry or a
mockery of bigotry.

Well I'm pleased that someone has at least considered the second
possibility!


--
....if someone seduced my daughter it would be damaging and horrifying
but not fatal. She would recover, marry and have lots of children...
On the other hand, if some elderly, or not so elderly, schoolmaster
seduced one of my sons and taught him to be a homosexual, he would ruin
him for life. That is the fundamental distinction. -- Lord Longford