Gordon Couger wrote:
Jonathan Ball wrote in message ...

Wim Jebster wrote:

Gordon Couger wrote in message
news:0AUP9.163736$qF3.10939@sccrnsc04...




They have hard lessons to learn in life if they ever hope to succeed
at anything.


they are lessons so far removed from their way of life that they cannot
even comprehend what the learning will teach them.
Remember these people ofter never impact on the real world. I remember
the ex wife of a friend of mine. She had no winter clothes, not even a
coat. She lived in a centrally heated house with garage built in, drove
to her centrally heated office, parked in the carpark underneath the
office building. She was known to wear less in winter than summer
because the office central heating was set a bit high.

expecting people like that to understand reality is like asking a
bullock to discuss quantum physics.

Just shut up, Wim. Every time you try to write
profundity, you fail and wind up looking stupid.

You and Gordon, and of course that stupid fat
hula-hooping pachyderm Sue Bitchup, all seem to think
that the only worthwhile lessons learned in life are to
be found in rural settings; in other words, "rural
life" = "reality".

You couldn't be more wrong. What a conceited bunch of
rustics you lot are! Don't you morons understand that
every time you write that kind of shit, you look ever
more stupid?


You still haven't answered what have you personally done for the
agricultural environment. Other than whine about it.

No, ****wit. You didn't ask originally what I had done
for the **agricultural** environment; you asked:

Give an example of something you have done to
directly improve the envrionment.

Whatever the **** the "envrionment" is.

Now, you've moved the goalposts. Suddenly, it's for
the "agricultural" environment.

Listen, shit-for-brains: most of what you have done
FOR the "agricultural" environment would be considered
to have been done AGAINST the overall environment.

Got it, ****witted rube?


I didn't develop the prototype of www.greenseeker.com on a rural
environment.

It's doubtful you developed it at all, you stinking
self-absorbed liar, but if you DIDN'T develop it on a
rural environment, given that it's about a wheat
fertilizer, than just where the **** DID you develop
it? In South-Central Los Angeles?

What a ****witted liar you are!

It will cut the nitrogen top dressed fertilzer in wheat by 50%
with out effecting yield and reduce broadcast spray uses of herbicide by 50%
an more with out effecting the weed control.

Gordon