On 2/8/2015 2:04 PM, Boron Elgar wrote:
On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 12:43:20 -0500, Frank
wrote:

Who would have thunk it?


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/eart...ndal-ever.html

The author of this article also disputes scientific findings about the
relationship between passive smoke and cancer and the risks of
asbestos.

Hardly a ringing endorsement of his credibility.


I don't go for the second hand smoke argument either. Everyone knows
that toxicity is dose related. And, asbestos won't jump up and bite
you, you have to breathe it into your lungs and you also have to smoke
to get cancer from it.