Thread: Scientists lie?
View Single Post
  #75   Report Post  
Old 16-03-2015, 01:14 AM posted to rec.gardens
songbird[_2_] songbird[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,072
Default Scientists lie?

Fran Farmer wrote:
....
To support my point, all you have to do is to read Cotton's letter to
the Iranians and then read what the Iranian Foreign Minister wrote in
response. One of those letters reads like it came from a smart, urbane
informed person. The other letter reads like it comes from the pen of a
parochial, patronising, ill informed person.


i'm very convinced that the USoA could be governed
much better by random selection than by what we get
from mass-media driven erectoids.

after 2 years there is a referendum on encumbents
to continue, then if they pass that election of
confirmation they have to pass a new referendum
every 4 years.

that way we keep the good ones, boot the bad ones,
and have a truely representative government with
nobody beholden to corporate campaign contributions.

far more efficient, far more likely to get some
decent people in office who aren't photogenic or
ignorant nepotists.

i'll take a random dud any time over the folks
we seem to elect these days.

oh, and as for pay and benefits, the longer you
are in office the better your pay and health care
percentages are, but you don't get a pension or
anything any different than most USoAians. in
other words, there's no reason the government should
be paying someone's health care the rest of their
life if they've only been in office a few years.
instead they can contribute to an IRA or some other
retirement slavings plan just like the rest of us...


songbird