View Single Post
  #5   Report Post  
Old 25-05-2003, 02:08 PM
Larry Harrell
 
Posts: n/a
Default GAO: Most forest thinning not seriously delayed by appeals

(Aozotorp) wrote in message ...
It's rather
interesting that both articles could include some of the real truth
but neither presents all the truth.

May 15, 2003 The Washington Times


Tilt!


The real tilt is: WHY DID SOOOO MANY NEWSPAPERS choose to disregard
the fact that many of those projects were "non-appealable"? Yet, they
chose to include them in the numbers of projects that weren't
appealed. Totally irresponsible news reporting, putting "spin" where
there is none. What could be next for Aozotorp? Postings from the
Enquirer?

Larry, the truth is out there.....in the woods....not in your
newspaper.