Thread: Logging (again)
View Single Post
  #19   Report Post  
Old 28-10-2002, 02:19 AM
Larry Harrell
 
Posts: n/a
Default Logging (again)
(votegreen=votebush) wrote in message . com...
++ And you will be left behind, while everyone else around you helps
to
right the wrongs and restore what has been missing. It's YOU that will
encourage arsonists to burn up remaining forests. It's YOU who will be
responsible for corporations making millions off burned timber. It's
YOU who will keep blaming everyone but themselves.++

So George is responsible for the forest blazes? Come on.


Fires are inevitable. It's preservationists who want to "save"
tinderboxes which will burn at a high intensity and kill everything in
its path. Sterilize the soil. Destroy irreplaceable wildlife habitat.
Everyone who wants to block the needed thinning projects will be at
fault.


++
I'm the one out there protecting goshawks, saving old growth and
keeping loggers from doing permanent damage to the forests. What have
YOU done for your forests lately?!?!?++


Cutting into any of the last roadless areas is not "helping" anything.
Its why 300 of the worlds top biologists crafted the roadless
initiative that keeps the status quo and ends the stupid bickering.

You're making stuff up. I never said I wanted to eliminate roadless
areas. Besides, logging is NOT banned in roadless areas. Clinton saw
to that despite public outcry. His advisors asked him not to because
the USFS wanted "flexibilty" in dealing with emergencies like, massive
bark beetle infestations and catastrophic fires.

You might want to get your facts straight before you point accusing
fingers.

Larry

there IS a difference between "preservationists", conservationists and
environmentalists