Tim Tyler writes
In uk.rec.gardening Jim Webster wrote:

: just stop the pollution in the first place. ban the flying of fruit. If it
: cannot survive by sea then tough

I don't think that is a realistic goal, though.

It's a perfectly achievable aim, though.

: lot easier than trying to undo the damage the plane did in the first place

Indeed - but you can't ground the world's planes without a pretty
convincing case.

Ahh, so environmental concern is fine, just so long as it doesn't bother
the consumer. You should stop 'them' from polluting because by
definition is isn't "us" causing pollution.

Even when it is.

It's like cars and congestion.

"They" shouldn't be allowed on the roads because 'they' cause
congestion.

"We" should be freely allowed on the roads, of course ...

--
Oz
This post is worth absolutely nothing and is probably fallacious.
Note: soon (maybe already) only posts via despammed.com will be accepted.