Clear Cut wrote in message ...
If you are interested in US statistics, spend some quality time with:


For a world wide perspective, explore the Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations. You can generate your own tables
from thier database:

http://apps.fao.org/


LOL, sorry, "you're" the one who has fallen for the depletion crisis.
To rationally decide there is a "depletion" problem, one must have
mathematically determined so, to not mathematically produce this
evidence means you've just listened to someones end of the world
scenario, and bought into it irrationally.





They say that between 1964 to 1994 there was a net loss of 376,560,000
Hectares of forest and woodlands. 1994 ws the last year that I could
quickly find statistics for. That's 12,552,000 Ha per year

Land Use
Forests And Woodland*(1000Ha)
Year 1994
AGG_COUNTRIES 8,344,870
(Aggregate of all countries)

Year 1964
AGG_COUNTRIES 8,721,430

If you would like a more detailed analysis, I would be happy to supply
one at my regular consulting rates.


A more detailed analysis translates as "more unactionable information,
for which the provider of such information benefits finacially", sorry
son, but i pay for goods and sevices that i consider worthy of my
expenditure.




I think that you will find the picture changes dramatically depending on
where you look.




Doesn't this suggest that the deforestation crisis is a hoax, we all
know forests are being harvested, we want to know if there is a
depletion threat. You seem to be suggesting that your professional
research will not yield any truth, can you see why i'm skeptical, i
don't doubt that environmental destruction and devastation are both
occuring, but that is being tempered by conservation and aforestation.

I've made the assumption that you're touting the hoax, if you're not,
and are an advocate of conservation and aforestation, excuse my
indulgence.