(ProNews/2 User) wrote in message news:OQ6DsnwHl2l0-pn2-dTtSb7BLR9nP@localhost...
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 07:56:03 UTC, wrote:

Major SNIP of personal attacts to make up for an inablility of the
person to read

Respond with the evidence of *** off you condescending mule.

ROTFLMAO
I was sure you were trolling, but wanted to give you the benefit of
the doubt. I no longer have any doubts.

LOL, you got nothing chump, except your delusions.
In typical fashion, you look for a "way out", your escape is from the
hoax you've become psychologically attached to.

Anyone who is unsure and reads this thread will...

1..see me asking repeatedly for evidence.
2..see you repeatedly failing to produce any.
3..and conclude that logging is occuring, but NO threat from
depletion.
4..will look much harder into any doomsday scenario's offered by
eco-groups or individual Greenies.


Conclusion.

It is "evidence", not assertion that one must use as a guide, and NO
evidence has been produced, if it was attainable, it is infantile to
assume that the eco-groups have been a bit slack and not got around to
it.

DEFORESTATION IS A HOAX...LOGGING IS A REALITY, and so are the jobs
and supplemental industries.