Not true, Aozotorp. It has been proven time and time again by science that
younger, faster growing trees uptake more CO2 than that of older trees.
If you can produce an actual scientific study that says otherwise (not just
some
native forest council hype), then let's see it!

-GK

Aozotorp wrote:

Does not matter = Take a buffered system = get it out of wack and it does not
matter what you add sometimes = Choose the simple solution = and reduce
pollution!




If those groups were truly "green", they'd support some logging that
would lock up carbon into long-term wood products instead of growing
firewood with which to heat our atmosphere. 7 million acres is a lot
of "firewood" to burn up in one year.

Toral rubbish! Given a system in what appears to be homeostatis \, You
want to
do as little as possible to upset that sytem such as by adding massive
amounts
of CO2 = ev ever study buffered systems in Chemistry?