View Single Post
  #7   Report Post  
Old 07-06-2003, 09:08 PM
Immortalist
 
Posts: n/a
Default Is it possible that never living could be a loss?


"Inger E Johansson" wrote in message
...
This article has no bearing for sci.archaeology at all.
It's as OT as OT can be.
Stop sending us this nonsense.

Inger E


While digging up tablets or other ways to record data have researchers ever
found indications of derogatory language or swearing? If so then there is at
least one instance where this topic is relevant to sci.archaeology.


"Jonathan Ball" skrev i meddelandet
...
wrote:
__________________________________________________ _______
From:
(Kevin and Donna Brandon)
Newsgroups:

alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,alt.f ood.vegan.science
Subject: Another ****wit
Date: 1 Jun 2003 07:27:23 -0700

If life is a benefit, then no-life is a loss.
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ


That's not Kevin's thought, ****wit, you lump of shit.
It's the absurd imlication of your ****witted belief.