On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 00:24:54 -0500, "B & J" wrote:

And just who is the voice of the Liberal Left? Even Kennedy is all for
compromise with Dubya on the senior drug issue. Lieberman is a
quasi-Republican, so why bother considering him. Gephardt is Missouri's
Stassen. Edwards has too many ties to his days of injury lawsuits. Graham of
Florida is a possibility, but he has the personality of cold oatmeal. Kerry
is a married to the Heinz fortune. Gore blew his wad when he lost a sure
thing. Dean of Vermont would do nothing in the South, but I like him. Who
else is available?

The only one of the Democratic politicos who has the ovaries to go after
Dubya is Hillary. The problem is that the electorate either love or hate
her, although her poll numbers are now a positive 43% that doesn't win an
election.

What I would like to see is enough Democrats go after Dubya about "weapons
of mass destruction" so that it becomes an election issue. I have a feeling
that the Republicans are really squirming over this issue.

John


Hey, no argument from me on any of what you said. Hillary is not going to run,
she made that clear in several interviews this week. I don't know how an
election debacle turned into "Gore blew his wad..." when clearly the popular
vote was his.

I also fully agree about WMD, as they now call it with loving adoration. If you
notice when dub speaks now, he says "...we know they HAD weapons of mass
destruction..." As if this was a past inquiry.

The whole lot of them suck the big one. Bush is patting soldiers on the head
when he himself went AWOL. Eh.