On Sat, 19 Jul 2003 13:32:57 +0100, "Jim Webster"
wrote:


"Moosh:]" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003 10:38:37 +0100, "Jim Webster"
wrote:


"Moosh:]" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003 08:16:28 +0100, "Jim Webster"
wrote:


"Moosh:]" wrote in message
.. .
On 17 Jul 2003 08:23:56 -0700, (Hua Kul) wrote:
Some religious fundamentalists are even sillier. JWs and their
blood
transfusion ban, ferinstance.


given the number of people who have got aids, hepititis and possibly
nvCJD
from blood transfusions, this isn't all that silly.

Yep, in some countries, today. But 30 years ago, these weren't a
problem but the JWs still objected. They quote some ambiguous
anti-canibalism passage from the Bible.

being right for the wrong reasons is still being right :-)

Damages the mind, as the skeptics will tell you

being right damages the humility

Not mine. I know no different

being right for the wrong reasons ensures that this will be less of a
problem :-)

I can remember as a kid getting the right answer to a math exam
question by using the unapproved method, and being marked wrong.
Scarred me for life