View Single Post
  #86   Report Post  
Old 22-07-2003, 03:19 AM
Jeff Young
 
Posts: n/a
Default Do Theories Have to be Testable to be Scientific?

"Bob White" wrote in message news:BJTSa.101044$OZ2.20188@rwcrnsc54...
"Jeff Young" wrote in message
...
"Bob White" wrote in message

news:ruURa.90117$ye4.65151@sccrnsc01...
"Jeff Young" wrote in message
m...
"Bob White" wrote in message

news:jIHRa.84306$Ph3.10244@sccrnsc04...
"Jeff Young" wrote in message
m...
"Bob White" wrote in message

news:xEBRa.82631$N7.11056@sccrnsc03...
"Jeff Utz" wrote in message
...
X-A-Notice: References line has been trimmed due to 512 byte
limitationAbuse-Reports-To: abuse at airmail.net to report

improper
postings
NNTP-Proxy-Relay: library2.airnews.net
NNTP-Posting-Time: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 08:16:35 -0500 (CDT)
NNTP-Posting-Host: ![$;F1k-Y'hiac\&8#rjC`%+^ (Encoded at

Airnews!)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165


"Richard Alexander" wrote in message
om...
root wrote in message

...
Richard Alexander wrote:
Historical events are--surprise!--History, not Science,

and
History
is
distinct from Science.

But it might take science to reveal history. The

distinction
isn't
as clear as you suggest.

There is a difference between science involvement and being

a
science.
Many church auditoriums are designed through the science of

acoustics,
but that doesn't mean that religion is a science.

Certain terms have taken on a life of their own. A "quantum

leap" or
"quantum advance" is used where we would normally say a

"huge
leap"
or
a "huge advance." Of course, a true quantum leap is an

extremely
small
thing, the difference, say, in electron orbits. Likewise,

saying
that
something is not scientific has become akin to saying that

something
is erroneous.

I disagree. I would argue that creationism is not scientific,
because
the
hypothesis that creation exists is not testable. That does not
mean
the
creationism does not exist, only that science cannot answer

the
question
whether or not creationism is true.


What prevents us from using the logical, systematic, scientific
method
of
investigation to investigate any proposition at all,

Like the proposition "God does not exist"?

That what

That what


Th- th- th- that's all folks.


That what


Th- th- th- th- that's all folks.

snip Fallacy of Argumentum ad Nauseum

Septic remains the completely fallacious, mendacious, ridiculous, and
discredited old idiot fool liar of alt.atheism.

Jeff