On Thu, 07 Aug 2003 06:02:48 GMT, "Moosh:}"
wrote:

On Tue, 05 Aug 2003 20:44:12 +0200, Torsten Brinch
posted:

On Tue, 05 Aug 2003 11:14:45 GMT, "Moosh:]"
wrote:

On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 14:40:52 +0100, "Jim Webster"
posted:
The sea of Cumbria is very closely monitored because of Sellafield Nuclear
Power Station, and it was discovered that actually there was so much
naturally occurring uranium in this ground up rock that they were bigger
polluters than Sellafield was.

what a maroon

Interesting, thanks. Just shows how safe nookyoulah powah is

However, be careful you do not mention Sellafield as a typical
example of what nuclear power has to offer on the polluting side,
when you are among supporters. You could get yourself killed. :-)

But as dangers are usually comparative, what about a compare with coal
fired power?

Sellafield versus a coal power plant? I can't see you posting a
compare doing harm to your rep. Consider making a new thread for it,
though.