In article ,
Psalm 110 wrote:

Nature-Hating Toxic-Spewing Republican Liar snips the citations of
Peer-Reviewed published toxicity data, then ACCUSES ME of attacking
the liar without providing the proof which the liar snipped.

In fact, none of the peer-reviewed articles you posted made
the claim that Roundup was dangerous to humans when used
as directed.

But, please, if I am wrong, feel free to point out the article
that does that.

Of course, you cannot do that. All you have are
personal attacks.


The integrity of the PERSON deserves arguing because the peer-reviewed
studies are settled beyond debate. Read the frigging MSDS required by
the EPA you damned fool gibbering idiot. The poison has a 22 year
halflife, meaning that whatever you use, one eight of it will still be
hanging around 30 years after you're dead.


One, just one, article in a peer-reviewed scientific article
that states that Roundup is dangerous to humans when used
as directed.

Nobody has argued that one cannot overdose or get acute
toxicity from overexposure. And the articles you posted
do a good job of showing that high doses are toxic -- as
is true with aspirin, salt, sugar, water, etc.

*None* of the peer-reviewed scientific articles you
posted, however, claim to show that Roundup is dangerous
to humans when used as direct. However, if you have such
an article, trot it out.


Please. Feel free.


Here, I'll help you. Just fill in the blanks:

Authors:
Title:
Journal:
Year:
Vol:
Pages:


Otherwise, it's not *me* who has a problem with truth.


billo