Give it up Bill. I never mentioned where you work, nor do I care, nor do I
necessarily believe because you have published papers, have different degrees
and can cut open a human down the middle that, you are necessarily more
qualified than any of us to determine that glyphosate is unhealthy or not.

I am not keeping Tom's work place secret, I happen to know where he works.
That's all I said. I still have no idea, nor do I care where you work.

I've been in the same category as you with someone with way too much free time
to drum up every post I'd ever made and used them against me. That didn't work
on me, and it shouldn't work on you, either.

All I am saying is that I am a homemaker, where I used to work is of no value to
you now, and that's really all I have to say. If Tom decides to tell you where
he works, so be it. I can say he is qualified and rather well informed. I
don't need to blow smoke up his ass. He is confident in himself.

So, anything else? If not, then take good care and forever may you be mindful
that the peer reviewed studies can and are tainted in the agchem industry. It's
done all the time. If Dr. Leibig were still alive, I'd send you to him to find
out. I'm relatively sure you can drum up his C.V.


On 19 Aug 2003 13:37:17 GMT, (Bill Oliver) opined:

In article ,
animaux wrote:
On 19 Aug 2003 03:01:03 GMT, (Bill Oliver) opined:


Only an ecofundamentalist would consider an ideologic catechism
a qualification for a scientific discussion.

I'd add people with compassion to the long list of people who don't buy into the
lies of the agchem industry.

What are your qualifications that would make anybody
think you can read the scientific literature critically?
What are your qualifications in toxicology? In cellular
biology? In molecular and clinical pathology?

What are yours?


I've given them. I am board certified in Anatomic, Clinical,
and Forensic Pathology. I have a BS in Microbiology, and an
MS in Computer Science. Since you and your friends have made
a point of where I work, then you know I work in the department
of Cellular Pathology, as well as being a Medical Examiner. I
am published in the areas of Computer Science, Psychiatry,
Quantitative Cytolopathology, General Pathology, and Forensic
Pathology.




After all, you, paghat, and Tom make a great deal of
who people are and what their qualifications are. Try
to do better than religious statements.

We don't lump in together. I happen to know where Tom works and I'm glad he
hasn't told you.


Funny thing about that, isn't it? It's *so* important
where *I* work and what *I* do and what *my* qualifications
are, but when it come to you guy's, it's time for secrets.

I am not surprised that you guys are so afraid of telling
us where you work.



Of course you can't.

Of course I can, but you don't believe anything other than your silly little man
world of knowing.


Heh.


See how easy that was?

Your turn.

It's already been done.

Nope. So far there hasn't been a single article pointed out that
didn't either note that the experiment was done at levels well
above that of normal usage or that had no significant effect on humans.

Those are your two choices.

Now, maybe I have overlooked that article you are talking about
that claimed to show that Roundup was dangerous to humans when
used as directed.

Please feel free to refresh my memory:

Authors:
Title:
Journal:
Year:
Volume:
Pages:

You don't buy it.


Oh, I'll buy it. You just have to *present* it. You haven't.

billo