In sci.med.nutrition Gordon Couger wrote:

"Brian Sandle" wrote in message
...
In sci.med.nutrition Gordon Couger wrote:

"Brian Sandle" wrote in message
...
snip
More likely they used pre-planting Roundup to remove weeds which
would compete with the emerging cotton. But the nettles were not
killed.

Nettles are perennial plants that root deep in the ground. The
area had had one rain in 2 months that they planted cotton after.
They did not bother to spray a few nettles when they would have to
spray in week or two for the weed that came up after the rain. You
don't spend the money for a few nettles that you will get a better
kill on when they have more leaves and growth.

Showing resistance, then. That is why Pursuit is needed?

Where did you get the idea Prusuit was used?

As I posted:
_________________________________________

Subject: GM crop farms filled with weeds (Was: Paying to find non-GE wild corn?)
Newsgroups: sci.med.nutrition,nz.general,sci.agriculture
Message-ID:
Date: 20 Aug 2003 23:38:36 -0500


On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 06:33:59 GMT
"Gordon Couger" wrote:
************
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Sandle"
Newsgroups: sci.med.nutrition,nz.general,sci.agriculture
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 7:45 PM
Subject: Paying to find non-GE wild corn?


: Gordon Couger wrote:
:
: "Brian Sandle" wrote in message
: ...
:
: shows the different in notil cotton and
: conventional till. In this case the notil is my neighbors
:
:
: What are the other plants in the no-till? Roundup-resistant?

No they haven't been sparyed yet. As I they are some kind of nettle that the
first spray of round up will knock out.
*********

Are you sure?


Linkname: Managing Roundup-resistant alfalfa
URL:
http://westernfarmpress.com/ar/farmi...alfa/index.htm
size: 181 lines


"There are weeds Roundup is weak on nettles, cheeseweed and filaree
but a tank mix of Roundup and Pursuit could be a good combination when
those weeds are present," Hembree said.

___________________________________

The worm doesn't have any way to ferment cellulose. Your
speculations are typical of the idiotic thinking that is used to
oppose science of all kinds. You have no idea how any of this
works but still you think your opinion has some value. If you want
to participate in science go learn some.

Sometimes not knowing can help one to jump through possibly wrong
limitations that the current known imposes.

You need some basic knowledge of the subject and you contiunly get thing
wrong like boll weevil insted of boll worm

That's what Usenet newsgroups are about, correcting one anothers' lacks
isn't it?

and Prusuit insted of Round Up

Maybe you didn't see the above article or read the http the first time I
posted it.

and thinking that short lived catipelar in an isolated environemtn can
develop a gut flora and faua to digest celulose. All not knowing does is
make a fool of yourself.

Does the wood borer worm develop such to begin eating wood?


Yes cattle are grass eaters. Yes they can be fed grain to fatten
them. Then some digestion is still progressing in the intestines and
the E.Coli can increase.

E. coli0157 can be foud in cattle every where in the world no matter if they
are fed grain or not.

Yes but a much more significant amount if grain-fed, since the digestive
process goes on into the intestines with grain-feeding, I think.


Termites can have bacteria or bigger organisms in their guts which
digest cellulose for them. The bollworm may be a bit simpler, but
who knows what may happen with the GM packages present in its feed?

The worm doesn't live long enough to develop the bacteria in it's gut and
there is no way to inoculate the worms gut.

I know the wood borer worm lives longer, but so it can start eating when
it comes out of its egg I guess the cellulose processing must develop
straight away for it to be able to eat. I suppose maybe the cellulose just
has the nutrients scraped or dissolved off it, and is cast aside. But one
poster thougth it could get energy from cellulose.

Go back to alt.to.stupid.to.find.food.

Getting a bit rattled, eh?