"Torsten Brinch" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 21:42:10 GMT, "Gordon Couger"
wrote:

All the data points used in the study except the discarded ones are in
the
paper. That should be enough to duplicate the statistics.

Um. The plotted points you see in the graphics, and the numbers in
tables are not raw values, they are means (n=3), three replicates
per treatment and sampling date.

However, apparently it is your hypothesis while looking at these data
points, that they are not all there, that some data points have been
discarded. But hey, that should be easily verifiable. Check, and you
should find for some sampling dates in plots and tables, that data
points are missing. :-)

Unfortunately for your hypothesis, they are all there.

There is no hypothesis the paper clearly states outliers are discarded. If
they are all there it is even worse as they don't show which data the paper
is based on.

Gordon