billo, each reader can judge for him/her self what information the abstract
provides; he/she can then decide whether they want to look at the full paper
and/or whether the abstract is sufficient for their purpose. In making that
decision I expect that they will take into consideration that the scientists
involved, the editor, and the reviewers have mutually agreed that the paper
was worth publishing and that the abstract represented what is in the paper.
I would also expect that they will take into consideration the reputation of
the journal and the authors' affiliations.

If you feel that the editor and reviewers were in error in approving the
wording/publication, you are entitled to submit your own analysis of any
paper for publication. It will be sent to reviewers, and then the editor
will review their comments and make a decision on whether your
comments/interpretation are worth publishing.

Henry Kuska, retired

http://home.neo.rr.com/kuska/