"Pat Meadows" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003 12:18:24 -0400, in rec.gardens.edible
"Mike Davis" wrote:

Hi Pat,

Two of Mollison's reasons for suggesting them that come to mind
include:
1. Much smaller surface area used for paths than a traditional row
garden.

Ah. Well, almost *anything* has less surface area for paths
than a traditional row garden!


Do you have any justification for this, in particular that keyhole beds
have less path area than rows? I am not trying to start an argument - I
want to know. It does not seem to me that Mollison proves this point at
all.

David