In article ,
Henry Kuska wrote:
billo said: " I gather then, that when you posted in reply to that
challenge, you were actually *not* posting in reply to that challenge, but
merely posting non-responsive things that had nothing to do with the claim
that Roundup is or is not dangerous to humans when used as directed."

H. Kuska reply: again your logic?????? I have posted a number of
literature references that have to do with side effects due to the
utilization of Round-up.

None of which purport to show any side effects in humans from
Roundup when used as directed.



Now please show me your logic diagram that excludes effects during pregnancy
from the universe that you include in the logic circle of "not dangerous to
humans when used as directed."



Please prove that pink bunnies with purple antlers don't exist in
the wild. After all, just because you can't find them no matter
how hard you look doesn't mean that you should infer they aren't
there, right? There is not *one* scientific article in a
peer-reviewed journal that claims to show that there is
any danger to humans from Roundup when used as directed.

You can believe in an unproven, unfounded, undocumented
speculation-based "danger" all you want. Just like you
can believe that there really is a big purple monster
under your bed at night that disappears whenever you
look. Just don't pretend your speculations are based
on science.



Apparently you do not think it is important to know that there is an
"elevated risk". That is your choice, if your wife agrees with you; she
can continue to apply Round-up when she is pregnant. Others may ellect to
apply the Precautionary Principle.


Yes, stay away from that evil oxygen and water.


billo