"Brian Sandle" wrote in message
...
Jim Webster wrote:


"Brian Sandle" wrote in message
...

Are you saying that the missionaries should never have gone out from
Britain a few centuries ago to start changing some of the societies
which
now worry you?

No

Some of your problem is saving the type of society in one geographical
area. Then perhaps saving one racial type?

What are you waffling on about? What has racial type got to door with
this
discussion?

Just geographical area which concerns you?


We do seek out likes. Creatures mate with likes up to a point. We need
to
protect the groups of likes.

As I mentioned before the whites in schools in New Zealand may be
having
fewer of the old role models amongst the advanced pupils as leaders.
But
can't the trade benefit all parties? I think it takes a change of
viewpoint as to life's values. Maybe we will have more whites feeling
they
are not earning enough to support a family and living a childless life.
I
think that needs a bit of atteniton where some support large families
on
welfare. Malaysia was trying to get more educated people to have more
children.

This is not easy to think or talk about.

And all utterly irrelevant to the discussion.

You talked about people taking your work if you help them in poor
countries.


not my work, only climate and soil type can let them grow grass, but YOUR
work as their level of education increases


Reading back through the thread you could take the noiton
that Jim is saying, `Yes, GM and the USA approach is right to be
suppressing poor countries so we can keep our jobs.'

YOUR job, not mine, as they get wealthier they buy more of the food we
produce, they try wheat bread, they eat exotic foriegn products like baked
beans or chili powder or chinese spices. But they get wealthier by taking
your job

JimWebster