In article ,
Henry Kuska wrote:

If billo wants to limit his criteria in his future posts to papers that
claim 100% certainty he can do so. I feel that such a restriction makes his
quest meaningless.




No, Henry. I simply accept what authors state. The association, in
the words of the authors, is "tentative." You may think they're lying,
but I believe them. And, since it compares glyphosate+pesticide to
glyphosate, to draw the conclusion that this means that glyphosate
alone is dangerous is drawing a conclusion that was simply not
tested.

If you want to test the toxicity of using glyphosate, then
test it against *not* using glyphosate.

If you test eating red beans + arsenic against eating
red beans alone, and the people who eat red beans and arsenic get
sick, that's not an indictment of the beans. Yet you
claim it is.



billo