In article 9nR7b.24740$n94.17204@fed1read04, "Just another fan"
wrote:

Why bother Henry, Dr. Shill will continue without ever understanding. He
is best enjoyed in your kill file.....

If you killfile him you'll miss him on other topics for which he's not
loony. Besides, even the loony stuff can be amusing.
Personally I only read about one in ten of his posts on this topic (after
the first week) because he got too trolly & redundant & stopped even
trying to make sense, but do see a bit more than I bother to open & read
when he gets quoted by others whose responses I read more wholeheartedly.
I wouldn't go so far as to killfile because in other threads he can be
totally of interest.

-paghat the ratgirl

"Henry Kuska" wrote in message
...
billo, I have decided to only answer questions from you concerning what
you
state that I have said when you put my actual statement in quotes. As a
professional courtesy I feel that I can ask such a request. I also insist
that you refrain from making inferences such as the following statements
that you have made that I feel have no place in a formal discussion
between
professionals : "Which is why you are working so hard to ban the use of
water, no doubt"; "Indeed when comparing one group that eats red beans and
arsenic and with a group that eats red beans, and the first group has an
increased death rate, Henry is convinced that means that red beans are
poisonous."; "You may think they're lying,"; "I know that you specialize
in
psychic understanding of articles"; "But, Henry, if you want to claim the
authors are lying"; "And in all of this, he claims he doesn't have to
bother
to read the articles because he just *knows* the details without
reading.";
" No, "a lie." Henry, Paghat, et al. trot out articles that explicitly
do
not claim what they say they claim. It's one thing to state one's
belief.
That's fine. It's another to outright lie about what an article
states.";
"Boy, you must be right. A person who goes through a quick training
program
and certification must never act in a way contrary to those guidelines";
"Once again, you pretend that something was tested in a paper that was not
tested."; "What is meaningless is to use the Psychic Science Network to
pretend that something is being tested when it is not."; "Now, using the
Henry Psychic Method of assuming results,"; "Now, I know, Henry, that you
do
consider comparing compliant vs noncompliant groups "meaningless"; "In
contrast, your assumption that *all* people are *always* compliant"; ....
I
could go on, but I have other things to do. I am willing to discuss
things
at a formal professional level.

Henry Kuska, retired

http://home.neo.rr.com/kuska/



--
"Of what are you afraid, my child?" inquired the kindly teacher.
"Oh, sir! The flowers, they are wild," replied the timid creature.
-from Peter Newell's "Wild Flowers"
See the Garden of Paghat the Ratgirl: http://www.paghat.com/