pee in the pile
Maybe you didn't read my earlier statements. I am disagreeing with you,
buckwheat.
You should not underestimate the potential of infectious diseases being
spread by a trash pile and the vermin they attract. Its just like the vermin
this thread attracts. You and Jim Bob should be dropped from the discussion.
no one of importance wrote in message
news:TfXdb.633582$o%2.291382@sccrnsc02...
OK, maybe you didn't read the whole thread. I was agreeing with James
that
the idea of AIDS being passed by urinating in a compost pile was pretty
much
stupid and should be dropped.
Philip
"Cereoid-UR12-" wrote in message
...
Since you are "no one of importance", we can ignore your request.
If you want to stick your head in the sand and pretend it doesn't exist
like
Reagan did, that's your personal prerogative and don't try to impose it
on
anyone else.
no one of importance wrote in message
news:ciRdb.626636$YN5.452308@sccrnsc01...
Agreed. Let's let the AIDS thing drop.
Philip
"JNJ" wrote in message
...
BTW, being HIV positive and urinating on the pile would be
little
different than someone not infected doing the same.
Nope, it wouldn't be "little different", it would be NO different.
The
virus doesn't live in air.
You are incorrect. Most individuals who are HIV positive are also
on
a
cocktail of medications to stay alive. Therefore the urine would
not
be
the
same -- there would be a variety of chemicals present that are not
present
in the urine of those not infected. Furthermore, each individual
would
likely not have the same biological processes, eating habits, and
other
factors that affect urine content. Ergo the statement that the two
would
be
little different.
Semantics aside, we're saying the same thing -- this aspect of the
thread
is
purely idiotic.
James
|