On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 10:18:30 +0000 (UTC), "Franz Heymann"
wrote:


"k" wrote in message
...
5858585858 5858585858
585 585 858
585 585 858
5858585858 5858585858
585 858 585
858 585 858
5858585858 585 858
5858585858 5858585858

Since you have snipped all context, lost all the headers and wrote in some
unintelligible code, your message is, fortunately, lost on me.

I suspect that we were supposed to see 58 or 85.
I didn't

--
Martin