"K" wrote in message
...

"Franz Heymann" wrote in message
...
:
: "K" wrote in message
: ...
:
: "Franz Heymann" wrote in message
: ...
: :
: : "Jane Ransom" wrote in message
: : news : : In article , Tony
: Bull
: : writes
: :
: : Apology accepted Franz, however I can't understand why you have
such
: a
: : downer on advertisements. You can at least passively ignore them.
i
: :
: : B U T I have to pay to download the !£*@!"£ things - and that I
: object
: : to - especially if I am downloading something that I know should
be
: free
: : of the things I don't want to pay to download ((
: :
: : If you are so broke that a thousandth of a penny matters to you,
join
: the
: : same ISP as I utilise. It does not charge for conection time at
all.
: :
: : Franz
: :
: So, what you're saying is, that it's alright for you to moan about the
: things you don't like, but not for others to do the same?
:
: Actually, no.
: Putting words into the mouths of others is one of the feeblest forms of
: forwarding an argument.
:
: Franz
:
Who's putting words into anyone's mouth? Please note the question mark at
the end of the sentence in my former post. I'm just trying to get it
clear
in my mind why your protestations about the things you find annoying are
any
more valid or important than those which annoy others, which you seem to
brush aside with a crass comment to the effect that it only costs xyz
pence
and if you can't afford it ........

That statement was factually and numerically correct.

I interpret that as being a Net Nanny when it suits you,

It worries me not at all what you interpret as what.
We are not all equally well endowed with interpretative qualities.

Franz