In article , martin
writes
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 11:05:22 +0100, Malcolm Ogilvie
wrote:


In article , martin
writes
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 18:23:44 +0100, Kay Easton
wrote:

In article , martin
writes

If you google search hard enough and long enough you will find a DEFRA
.pdf file AFAIR that explains what action and against whom is to be
taken against those growing Giant Hog weed. In the case of private
individuals growing it, who refuse to remove it, a civil action may be
taken against them by the local authority.

That is if they are allowing it to be released into the wild.

No!

Yes!

Please read the Act and the commentary again:

Here is the Act:

"Section 14(2)
It is an offence for a person to plant or otherwise cause to grow
in the wild any plant on Schedule 9 (Part 2)"

I think the problem is that the plant part was tacked onto an animal
act. Releasing into the wild has a clear meaning with animals and a
not so clear meaning with plants.

Does that mean you agree with me???

Can you give me the links to the whole act and it's various
amendments.

You gave the links yourself. Just click on 'Contents' at the foot of the
page. That's by far the most accessible version with its commentaries.

Or if you want to read the whole Act, as published, you can find it on:

http://www.hmso.gov.uk/

Do many people cultivate hog weed in Uk gardens?

If you mean *giant* hogweed, I know at least two, both of whom like it
for its grandeur and looks, but are careful (a) not to touch it without
gloves and (b) let it escape.

--
Malcolm Ogilvie