Remind me why I wanted rain?
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 12:50:45 GMT, Jaques d'Alltrades
wrote:
The message
from martin contains these words:
It only needs a disaffected spammer to report that mail is being deleted
by a named ISP, and the police *MUST* investigate. How thoroughly they
do so is another matter. Remember, this is a criminal matter, not a
civil one.
Go away and read the law you quoted very carefully!
The offence you quoted applies to unauthorised interception of mail
and phone tapping.
And of course, e-mail is not covered by this?
let's try again
a) an anonymous sender sends spam to me
b) I AUTHORISE my ISP to tag it
of course it's not covered by it.
Then, if the police do investigate, and are of the opinion that there is
a pima facie case, they must pass the matter to the DPP.
You watch too much Inspector Morse :-)
I haven't got a haunted fishtank. I prefer RL.
almost back on topic there :-)
--
Martin
|