NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.72.169.230
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1069430977 60686810 217.72.169.230 (16 [133281])
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To:
Path: kermit!newsfeed-east.nntpserver.com!nntpserver.com!eusc.inter.net! fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!217.72.169.230!not-for-mail
Xref: kermit uk.rec.gardening:176477

Franz Heymann wrote:
"BAC" wrote in message

Probably not, since THC, the 'active ingredient' is at low levels (0.3% or
less) in 'legal' varieties.


In what way would the legal variety be distinguishable from the illegal one,
to the eyes of a prying officialdom?

Smell, certainly. But the main way an official can tell if a crop is
legal or not, is that you must have a licence to grow it. If you don't
have a licence, pack your steel-seated pajamas, you're off to prison.